As we start 2025, we mirror on our many achievements in 2024—from the International Freedom of Expression Prizes to a number of webinar collection to new multilingual sources. We additionally want to thanks, expensive reader.
Owing to your curiosity and dedication, this previous yr alone, over 460,000 folks used the International Case Legislation database, and we reached nearly two thousand subscribers on our mixed lists.
A lot of the content material we spotlight—occasions, studies, and scholarly publications—comes straight from companions who see CGFoE as a precious platform for reaching the broader freedom of expression neighborhood.
We’re very grateful for this. Please proceed to remain in contact.
Concluding 2024, for the primary time, the CGFoE Workforce sat down collectively to evaluate and choose crucial instances revealed over the past twelve months. We selected three classes: Worldwide Perspective options rulings that advance worldwide freedom of expression requirements; Novel Authorized Reasoning highlights a major novel freedom of expression precedent; and Contracting Freedom of Expression factors to a violation of freedom of expression requirements.
We’re sharing the outcomes of our group vote and skilled feedback with you.
TOP 2024 CASES
Worldwide Perspective
European Courtroom of Human RightsSuprun v. RussiaJune 18, 2024
“This case is particularly precious because it upholds entry to data in a context the place the suitable to reality and historic reminiscence take priority too. With the rise of authoritarianism in all latitudes of the world, the safety of expression remains to be among the best treatments in opposition to forces that search to suppress proof of previous abuses and rewrite historical past to tailor it to political functions. This resolution strengthens such protections.”Juan Manuel Ospina, Editor and Authorized Researcher
“At a time when authoritarian regimes more and more search to rewrite or suppress historic narratives, the choice underscores the crucial significance of safeguarding entry to data and defending the pursuit of historic reality. By affirming these ideas amidst a worldwide rise in disinformation and state management over historic information, the ruling serves as a robust reminder of the function of unbiased analysis and free expression in preserving democratic values.”Marija Šajkaš, Communications Specialist
“This pivotal ruling strengthens entry to data, a cornerstone of democratic accountability and institutional integrity. By affirming the suitable to acquire publicly held data, the Courtroom bolsters the requirements of transparency and reinforces the function of free expression in difficult disinformation and fostering historic reality. Suprun v. Russia emerges as a landmark within the ongoing effort to safeguard democratic values and construct resilient establishments, significantly amidst a worldwide wave of authoritarianism and makes an attempt to obscure public information.’’Anderson J. Dirocie De León, Authorized and Program Advisor
The case evaluation can be out there in Spanish.
Inter-American Courtroom of Human RightsMemoria Activa v. ArgentinaJanuary 26, 2024
“It is a landmark resolution coping with the deadliest terrorist assault in opposition to the Jewish neighborhood in Argentina—the 1994 bombing of the Asociación Mutual Israelita Argentina—and the condemnation of the Argentine state was a historic milestone within the victims’ three-decade wrestle for reality and accountability. The Inter-American Courtroom established groundbreaking norms of entry to data in instances of grave human rights violations and consolidated the hyperlink between transparency, democratic management of intelligence operations, and the preservation of historic reminiscence. This ruling not solely reaffirms the suitable to reality, but in addition underscores the necessity to dismantle structural impunity by means of institutional reforms and judicial ensures.”Lautaro Furfaro, Authorized Researcher
“Amongst different measures, the Courtroom ordered structural reforms relating to the usage of intelligence data as proof in judicial instances and on entry to documentation. Moreover, the Courtroom ordered the regulation of declassification processes, guaranteeing full entry for victims to declassified data, which have to be correctly preserved to facilitate public session and transparency.”Estefanía Mullally, Program Coordinator
The case evaluation can be out there in Spanish.
Novel Authorized Reasoning
BrazilThe case of judicial harassment in opposition to journalists in BrazilMay 22, 2024
‘‘This landmark resolution by the Brazilian Supreme Courtroom represents a crucial step in addressing the misuse of SLAPPs as instruments for silencing dissent. By declaring judicial harassment of journalists unconstitutional, the Courtroom not solely reinforces press freedom but in addition units a precedent within the Latin American context, the place such abusive practices have more and more threatened public debate. This ruling highlights the revolutionary authorized reasoning behind recognizing SLAPPs as a systemic risk to freedom of expression, paving the way in which for strong authorized protections in opposition to such abuses within the area and past.’’Anderson J. Dirocie De León, Authorized and Program Advisor
“With this ruling, the Brazilian Supreme Courtroom joins a rising Latin American authorized dialog—together with courts in Colombia, Mexico, Argentina, Uruguay, and the Inter-American Courtroom of Human Rights, amongst others—that has conceptualized SLAPPs as a device of abusive restriction to freedom of expression. Specifically, since 2020, courts within the area have begun to conceptualize this phenomenon and set up authorized treatments to curb its chilling impact on debates of public curiosity.”Lautaro Furfaro, Authorized Researcher
“This landmark ruling was celebrated by civil society organizations, together with Media Defence and the Committee to Defend Journalists, because it marks a major development for press freedom and the safety of unbiased journalism within the area. By declaring judicial harassment of journalists and media retailers unconstitutional, the Federal Supreme Courtroom of Brazil goals to place an finish to the abuse of the authorized system as a device for intimidation and censorship.”Estefanía Mullally, Program Coordinator
The case evaluation can be out there in Spanish.
Contraction of Freedom of Expression
Hong KongCase of “Glory to Hong Kong” SongMay 8, 2024
“This alarming ruling disproportionately suppresses political speech, making a chilling impact on Hong Kong’s pro-democracy motion. By undermining judicial independence and deferring to the manager department’s evaluation of nationwide safety threats—whereas misapplying comparative UK legislation—the choice additional entrenches autocratic management. The federal government’s use of a civil injunction to increase the attain of its nationwide safety legislation complicates resistance from web service suppliers, forcing tech firms into complicity with censorship and enabling a sweeping takedown of the protest music.”Hawley Johnson, Affiliate Director
“The case provides to the brutal crackdown on basic rights and freedoms in Hong Kong. With dozens of different instances that contract expression—Jimmy Lai’s trial, 45 activists sentenced to jail phrases most just lately—this one stands out as a result of a music is on trial. The Courtroom sides with the federal government and deems the anthem a nationwide safety risk.”Anastasiia Vorozhtsova, Editor and Authorized Researcher
The case evaluation can be out there in Spanish.
This submit was initially revealed by International Freedom of Expression, Columbia College – which stands for advancing understanding of the norms and establishments that finest shield the free stream of knowledge and expression. It is reproduced with permission and thanks.
