By Salam Fatohi
A latest Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Faculty of Public Well being report got here out with a number of suggestions to cut back “gun violence.” The five-point plan, constructed by the college’s “Consortium for Danger-Primarily based Firearm Coverage,” promotes the concept that gun possession could be higher handled as a privilege and never for granted assured by the U.S. Structure for all law-abiding residents.
That consortium is a part of Johns Hopkins Heart for Gun Violence Options, which views “gun violence” as a “public well being emergency.” That’s the identical type of language that foisted disproven masks mandates and vaccinations to stop COVID-19, which have been later revealed to do nothing to cease the pandemic’s unfold and the vaccine routine didn’t really vaccinate in any respect. NSSF has mentioned it earlier than. Legal misuse of firearms isn’t a illness. It’s a criminal offense situation. Treating crime as a public well being disaster that may be “cured” is, and can at all times be, ineffective. Stopping crime means imposing felony legal guidelines in opposition to criminals that commit crimes.
This is similar “gun management in a lab coat” strategy that former U.S. Surgeon Common Vivek Murthy took within the waning days of the Biden administration, after he promised Congress he wouldn’t. After all, the Johns Hopkins consortium report doesn’t advocate locking up criminals that break the legislation. It recommends new restrictive gun licensing legal guidelines that solely create boundaries to lawful firearm possession by those that don’t break the legislation.
Name it Crime
It shouldn’t take a doctorate diploma to know that criminals, by the very definition, don’t comply with the legislation. Layering on new legal guidelines received’t make criminals cease committing crimes. What does cease them is placing them behind bars.
However, the “good” folks at Johns Hopkins got here up with their five-point plan for gun licensing they declare would carry down the charges of “gun violence.” That plan recommends that to ensure that law-abiding residents to buy weapons, states undertake proof of firearm security coaching, fingerprint each potential gun purchaser, conduct in-person interviews to acquire a permit-to-purchase a firearm, endure a “complete” background verify and be topic to ready intervals earlier than taking possession of a firearm even after having handed a “complete” background verify.
These suggestions are fraught with issues. First amongst them are questions of whether or not these would intrude on rights protected by the Second Modification. The “good” folks at Johns Hopkins pitch their permit-to-purchase thought as “guaranteeing that solely eligible and accountable folks can legally buy firearms.”
That begs the query, although, that if the issue isn’t with law-abiding gun house owners, how would this forestall prohibited people from acquiring firearms? These are people who’ve been convicted of a felony, been involuntarily dedicated to a psychological well being facility or aren’t of authorized age.
The consortium’s report admits that those that are ineligible or would illegally straw buy a firearm for somebody who can’t purchase one on their very own, wouldn’t be deterred. Nevertheless, they fail to say that criminals convicted of their crimes involving firearms admitted that they obtained their gun illegally. A Bureau of Justice Statistics survey confirmed that in 2016, 90 p.c of criminals convicted of a criminal offense involving a firearm admitted to acquiring it illegally. Most of them bought the gun they utilized in a criminal offense by the black market. The FBI warns that firearm theft is a rising concern as a supply of criminally-obtained firearms.
Rejected Coverage
One other of the consortium’s suggestions is a gun management coverage masquerading as a “public well being emergency.” The coverage they need states to undertake is “common background checks,” which necessitates a nationwide firearm registry to work. That concept was rejected by Congress as a result of it might put each law-abiding American on a authorities watch record, merely for exercising their rights to maintain and bear arms.
Latest historical past has proven that states are irresponsible with gun house owners’ personal data. It’s been conveniently “leaked” by states perennially pushing extra gun management. The personal knowledge of over 190,000 Californians with hid carry permits was “leaked” and downloaded about 2,734 instances. The names and addresses of handgun allow holders in two New York counties have been revealed on an interactive map, jeopardizing their security and making a criminals’ Christmas record of the place they know they may attempt to steal weapons.
SEE ALSO: Deep Dive into the MAC 9 1911 Double Stack
The consortium says none of this needs to be of authorized concern. Their report notes that the U.S. Supreme Courtroom struck down New York’s “could situation” hid carry licensing legislation over the right trigger requirement. Nevertheless, they argue that decrease courts are grappling with whether or not those self same requirements ought to apply to state permits-to-purchase, even going so far as saying these allow restrictions, which would come with an in-person interview to justify a purchase order, could be constitutional below the Second Modification.
They cited Illinois’s Firearm Proprietor Identification (FOID) card. That state legislation required a person to acquire a state permission slip to purchase a gun or ammunition. The report fails to say that the requirement was simply dominated unconstitutional for a person possessing a firearm in their very own house. With regards to the consortium’s suggestion for a compulsory ready interval for lawful firearm purchases, a federal courtroom in Maine simply enjoined the state’s 72-hour ready interval legislation violates Second Modification rights.
Similar Gamers, Previous Concepts
These aren’t novel concepts. They’ve been rinsed and repeated by gun management teams, coverage suppose tanks and medical professionals for many years within the hopes of instituting gun management below the guise of a “public well being emergency.” It’s simple to hint the agenda when somebody traces the cash. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Faculty of Public Well being, Heart for Gun Violence Options is funded by none apart from antigun billionaire Michael Bloomberg. He’s the identical gun management fats cat that bankrolls Everytown for Gun Security and March for Our Lives gun management teams, in addition to The Hint. He drops tens of thousands and thousands into Congressional and presidential races to advance his gun management imaginative and prescient. He even flirted along with his personal presidential run earlier than flaming out after admitting weapons have been high quality for him however not each different law-abiding American.
The consortium’s report was additionally funded by The Joyce Basis, which frequently companions with universities to propel their gun management agenda. The Joyce Basis “financed scholarships for legislation faculties to advertise a authorized idea that the Second Modification doesn’t defend a person’s proper to bear arms, claiming the modification assured a state authorities’s proper to arm an organized militia,” in keeping with InfluenceWatch.org. When the U.S. Supreme Courtroom affirmed the person proper to maintain and bear arms below Heller, The Joyce Basis switched techniques, labeling gun management as a “public well being” situation.
The Joyce Basis additionally gave “tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars} to fund greater than 100 antigun grants to researchers at Harvard College, the Illinois Council In opposition to Handgun Violence, Worldwide Affiliation of Chiefs of Police, Freedom States Alliance, Iowans for the Prevention of Gun Violence, the Ohio Coalition In opposition to Gun Violence, and Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort. In previous years, the group has devoted 10 p.c of its outlays to gun management grants,” in keeping with InfluenceWatch.org.
The board of administrators and day-to-day management embody gun management advocates, and even former President Barack Obama was on the board from 1994-2002.
These good folks at universities ought to know by now that their makes an attempt to wrap a political agenda in a white lab coat isn’t the prescription that may work. The American public deserves higher than gun management disguised as a treatment.
*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! All Native Gross sales are FREE! ***
