Estimated studying time: 2 minutes
The Second Modification Basis (SAF) simply filed its transient within the Harrel v. Raoul case, difficult Illinois’ sweeping ban on so-called “assault weapons” and standard-capacity magazines.
Filed with the Seventh Circuit Courtroom of Appeals, SAF argues that the banned firearms—like AR-15-style rifles—and the magazines they use are squarely protected below the Second Modification.
SAF Government Director Adam Kraut was candid.
“The trendy semiautomatic rifles banned in Illinois are among the many mostly owned firearms within the nation,” he mentioned, “putting them nicely throughout the safety of the Second Modification.”
SAF is joined by the Illinois State Rifle Affiliation, Firearms Coverage Coalition, two gun shops, and lead plaintiff Dane Harrel.
The case has already seen two favorable rulings in District Courtroom, together with a preliminary injunction and a ruling on the deserves.
Now it’s as much as the Seventh Circuit to weigh the total trial file and apply the Supreme Courtroom’s Heller and Bruen selections. SAF hopes the court docket will lastly trash what it calls unconstitutional legal guidelines.
“Illinois legislators could disagree with the Structure and the Supreme Courtroom,” mentioned SAF founder Alan Gottlieb. “However they don’t get to ban broad classes of fashionable arms… Arduous cease.”
This submitting comes simply days after the U.S. Supreme Courtroom declined to listen to Snope v. Brown and Ocean State Tactical v. Rhode Island—two high-profile challenges to comparable bans.
That call sparked outrage from gun rights teams and commentators. NSSF slammed the Courtroom’s refusal as a “deeply disappointing” failure to defend core rights.
Justice Thomas dissented, writing, “I might not wait to determine whether or not the federal government can ban the preferred rifle in America.”
William Kirk of Washington Gun Regulation known as the denial “a massacre” for gun house owners, accusing the Courtroom of ducking a defining struggle.
However for now, the battle shifts again to the Seventh Circuit. SAF says it’s not backing down—and neither are thousands and thousands of lawful gun house owners.
*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! ***




















