Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R.) simply signed a invoice banning Crimson Flag legal guidelines, even ones adopted by the federal authorities.
He authorised the SB1362 final week, which prevents native governments from implementing Excessive Danger Safety Orders (ERPOs). It bars Texas municipalities from utilizing ERPOs in civil circumstances to strip weapons from sure people who a decide or Justice of the Peace deems to be a menace to themselves or others, except they’re charged with a criminal offense or have a home violence restraining order. It additionally purports to ban any future federal try to concern ERPOs in Texas.
“We don’t want magistrates or judges figuring out, with out due course of, somebody’s constitutional rights,” Texas Consultant Cole Hefner (R.), who sponsored the invoice, mentioned throughout a committee listening to earlier this yr.
The transfer comes as gun-rights activists have more and more lobbied in opposition to ERPOs, with Montana passing an analogous ban earlier this yr. Oklahoma, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Wyoming even have ERPO bans, whereas 21 different states have some type of Crimson Flag regulation. The invoice additionally comes as a part of a broader push by Texas Republicans to loosen the state’s gun restrictions. Along with the ERPO ban, Abbott additionally signed payments barring localities from taking part in gun buybacks, recognizing concealed-carry permits from all different states, and eradicating short-barrel shotguns from a state ban.
The ERPO invoice makes it a state felony to concern or implement “a written order, warrant, or govt order” with the intention of “lowering the danger of loss of life or harm associated to a firearm by: prohibiting an individual from proudly owning, possessing, or receiving a firearm; or requiring an individual to give up a firearm or in any other case eradicating a firearm from an individual.” It supplies an exception for orders issued on the “foundation of conduct that resulted in a prison cost for the one who is the topic of the order” or orders from different states which might be “acknowledged or enforceable beneath the [Texas] Household Code or the Code of Prison Process.”
The invoice additionally makes an attempt to nullify enforcement of a possible federal Crimson Flag regulation.
“A federal statute, order, rule, or regulation purporting to implement or implement an excessive threat protecting order in opposition to an individual on this state that infringes on the particular person’s proper of due course of, conserving and bearing arms, or free speech protected by the USA Structure or the Texas Structure is unenforceable as in opposition to the general public coverage of this state and shall haven’t any impact,” it reads.
At present, there isn’t a federal ERPO regulation–although the Texas regulation additionally bars localities from accepting present federal grants to implement ERPOs. The state regulation may run into issues if the federal authorities ever did undertake an ERPO regulation due to the US Structure’s Supremacy Clause, which prioritizes federal legal guidelines over state ones.
Nonetheless, gun-rights advocates cheered the regulation’s adoption. They argued ERPOs might be misused as a result of judges may grant them primarily based on false accusations and even abuse their energy through the use of them to confiscate firearms from harmless folks with out correct justification.
“This ensures that out-of-state or federal crimson flag orders can’t be enforced in Texas with out correct due course of protections,” the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation wrote in a Could message to members.
These in favor of Crimson Flag legal guidelines argued the legal guidelines forestall folks in disaster from posing a hazard to themselves or others, whereas nonetheless permitting law-abiding residents to own firearms.
“EROs present a crucial alternative to forestall mass shootings, homicides, and suicides,” Nicole Golden, the manager director of Texas Gun Sense, instructed KUT Information in Could. “The invoice itself defines ERPOs as having the first objective of lowering firearm loss of life or harm. And with greater than 4,000 Texas gun deaths a yr, that is one thing we ought to be doing extra of, not much less.”
Texas Consultant Ana-Mariía Rodriíguez Ramos (D) mentioned the “Anti-Crimson Flag Act” is harmful.
“This invoice places lives in danger by stripping communities of commonsense instruments accessible to cease violence earlier than it occurs,” she instructed The Texas Tribune in Could. “And never solely does it get rid of an choice for a coverage that we don’t even have in place in Texas, it criminalizes the individuals who attempt to use this strategy.”
Finally, Abbott sided together with his fellow Republicans and signed the invoice into regulation.
SB 1596, one other invoice signed by Governor Abbott, removes short-barrel firearms from the state’s listing of unlawful weapons. It legalizes possession of short-barrel shotguns and rifles beneath state regulation. Nevertheless, they’ll nonetheless be topic to stringent federal rules by the Nationwide Firearms Act of 1934, which taxes and registers short-barrel firearms.
“The straightforward fact is brief rifles are by no means an issue and proceed to not be an issue,” Texas Senator Brent Hagenbuch (R), who sponsored the shotgun invoice, mentioned in a March committee listening to.
Texas additionally banned native governments from enacting gun buyback applications by HB 3053. This comes after cities reminiscent of Houston and San Antonio have been internet hosting gun buyback occasions, giving residents the possibility to promote their weapons to their native authorities. These cities will seemingly be barred from internet hosting these occasions sooner or later.
Lastly, Abbott additionally signed SB 706. That invoice requires Texas to honor the concealed-carry permits issued by all different states.

![Analysis: The Changes Gun-Control Groups Want in DOJ’s Rights Restoration Plan [Member Exclusive]](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08202-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)




![Analysis: How DOJ Justifies the NFA Despite its New $0 Tax [Member Exclusive]](https://i3.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08030-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)













