The Trump Administration filed a first-of-its-kind transient in a Second Modification case on the Supreme Court docket of america (SCOTUS).
The Division of Justice (DOJ) on Monday filed an amicus transient in Wolford v. Lopez. The transient argues that Hawaii’s regulation, which inverts the normal understanding of property rights by prohibiting concealed-carry license-holders from carrying firearms onto non-public property that’s open to the general public with out the property proprietor’s categorical permission, “successfully nullifies the public-carry proper” beneath the Second Modification. Due to this fact, the DOJ mentioned SCOTUS ought to declare the regulation invalid.
“Hawaii’s restriction is blatantly unconstitutional as utilized to non-public property open to the general public. States can not evade Bruen by banning public carry by means of oblique means,” the transient reads. “As a result of Hawaii’s regulation plainly violates the Second Modification, this Court docket ought to reverse the choice under.”
The brand new submitting marks the primary time in American historical past that the Justice Division has filed an amicus transient in assist of gun-rights plaintiffs in a Second Modification case on the Supreme Court docket. Given the company’s stature, the arguments it superior will seemingly carry appreciable weight with the justices as they decide the place to come back down on the case.
The part of the Hawaii regulation at subject—dubbed the “Vampire Rule” by its critics within the gun-rights advocacy house—is one in all quite a few restrictions on hid carry that the state handed within the aftermath of the Supreme Court docket’s 2022 Bruen choice, which invalidated the state’s earlier gun-carry regime. It was pioneered by lawmakers in New York as a solution to restrict the breadth of hid carry permits, and it has since turned up in California, New Jersey, and Maryland as nicely.
Although each different court docket to think about the rule has enjoined it, the Ninth Circuit Court docket of Appeals upheld Hawaii’s model final September. The plaintiffs then appealed that call, and SCOTUS determined to take up the case in October.
Monday’s transient will not be the primary time that the case has attracted the Justice Division’s consideration. In Could, the DOJ took the weird step of supporting the petitioners’ request for the Court docket to intervene, despite the fact that the company will not be a celebration to the case. Many specialists consider that seemingly performed a job in persuading the justices to comply with take up the problem.
Lawyer Normal Pam Bondi (R.) mentioned the transient was a part of her workplace’s concerted effort to defend gun rights on this case and in others prefer it.
“As I mentioned quickly after taking workplace, the Second Modification will not be a second-class proper,” Bondi mentioned in a social media assertion. “My Justice Division will proceed to be probably the most pro-Second Modification Justice Division in historical past.”
The DOJ’s exercise in assist of state-level gun rights causes throughout Bondi’s tenure has drawn plaudits from Second Modification advocates for occasions when it has gone above and past what earlier administrations have finished. Along with submitting supportive authorized briefs, the division has intervened to take part in oral arguments in opposition to Illinois’ “assault weapon” ban. It additionally launched the first-ever “sample or observe” investigation on Second Modification grounds into the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Division earlier this 12 months over allegations that the county has been sluggish strolling its processing of hid carry purposes.
On the identical time, the DOJ has more and more been the topic of rising frustration amongst some gun-rights teams for its strategy to defending federal gun restrictions.
This dichotomy once more caught the eye of teams like Gun Homeowners of America, who’ve been crucial of the Trump Administration’s protection of federal legal guidelines, following the DOJ’s newest transient. GOA identified that it got here simply days after a separate transient from the DOJ opposing the group’s problem to the Nationwide Firearms Act.
“Submitting this transient is nice—these different actions are unacceptable,” the group wrote on social media.

![Analysis: The Changes Gun-Control Groups Want in DOJ’s Rights Restoration Plan [Member Exclusive]](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08202-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)


![Analysis: How DOJ Justifies the NFA Despite its New $0 Tax [Member Exclusive]](https://i3.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08030-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)















