Estimated studying time: 2 minutes
“We now have extra weapons on this nation than now we have people. So one of many issues that’s going to be necessary is to create a registry so we all know the place the weapons are. We all know once they go into the unsuitable fingers once they’re stolen. And we will truly begin a buyback program. I do know that among the Minnesota legislators have had that laws and that’s one thing that we needs to be fascinated about on a federal degree.” — Rep. Ilhan Omar
🚨 Make no mistake: So-called “gun registries” are step one to firearm confiscations. @IlhanMN’s agenda has nothing to do with security. It’s all about eroding your Second Modification rights. pic.twitter.com/ML7ojmddw9
— NRA (@NRA) December 1, 2025
Calling for a nationwide gun registry and federal “buyback” isn’t simply dangerous coverage. It’s a constitutional pink flag wrapped in feel-good rhetoric.
Begin with the registry.
Saying “we simply must know the place the weapons are” sounds innocent till you keep in mind what a registry truly is: a authorities record of who owns what firearms, the place they stay, and what they’ve received.
Historical past, each right here and overseas, exhibits that registries aren’t some impartial security instrument. They’re the prerequisite for future restrictions and, within the worst circumstances, confiscation. If the state is aware of precisely the place each gun is, it additionally is aware of precisely the place to go when the political winds shift.
Then there’s the concept a registry lets authorities know when weapons “go into the unsuitable fingers.” That’s fantasy-level forms.
Criminals don’t file change-of-ownership varieties. Straw patrons and thieves aren’t logging into some federal portal. The one folks assured to be tracked and punished when the foundations change are the law-abiding.
The “buyback” half is simply as backwards. The federal government didn’t promote these weapons to start with, so it’s not “shopping for them again.” It’s paying folks with their very own tax {dollars} to give up lawfully owned property, whereas violent offenders maintain doing violent-offender issues.
Framing all of this as an affordable response to “too many weapons” skips the core difficulty: the proper to maintain and bear arms is a person constitutional proper, not a privilege that exists provided that Washington can barcode each rifle and pistol within the nation.
In a free society, authorities doesn’t get to maintain a grasp record of who’s armed. That’s the purpose of the Second Modification. Not a bug to be mounted with a registry and a catchy title for confiscation-lite.
*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! ***
