“TATE001”
That’s the official serial variety of what seems to be the primary legally registered 9mm potato silencer, based on a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) registration kind obtained by The Reload. It’s registered to a person named Zach Clark, who mentioned he pulled off the feat as an act of defiance in opposition to the Nationwide Firearms Act (NFA).
“It’s a great way to focus on to regular people who like, ‘Yeah, that is dumb,’” Clark instructed The Reload. “This entire regulation is sort of dumb.”
The spud suppressor will be the most exceptional results of the NFA tax lower enacted originally of the 12 months as a part of President Donald Trump’s One Large Stunning Invoice, which made the price of registering suppressors $0 and opened up the floodgates. The ATF noticed extra NFA digital registration requests on New Yr’s Day than at any time in its historical past. The decrease value of compliance, mixed with a recently-digitized course of, has made new sorts of suppressors–together with disposable and even meme designs–extra viable than earlier than.
“The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) knowledgeable NSSF that on Thursday, January 1, 2026, alone, an unprecedented surge in e-Varieties submissions had been being processed,” the Nationwide Capturing Sports activities Basis, the gun business’s commerce group, mentioned final week. “That whole was roughly 150,000 e-Varieties. For an eye-popping comparability, final 12 months, forward of the $200-to-$0 tax change, typical day by day quantity on e-Varieties for suppressors, SBRs and SBSs would hover nearer to round 2,500.”
Whereas the NFA requires registration of all sound-suppressing units that connect to a gun barrel to be registered with the ATF, it offers a course of for individuals to register their very own selfmade designs. In the identical method that any individual shopping for a suppressor from a retailer must fill out an NFA registration kind and get the ATF to approve it earlier than taking possession of the system, a house builder has to submit their intent to construct one and get approval earlier than truly developing the system.
Clark went via that course of together with his potato suppressor design. He mentioned he made positive to maintain potatoes out of his home whereas he waited to listen to again from the ATF.
“As of this second, I’ve the serialized washer, and I’ve the potato, however I haven’t put it collectively,” he instructed The Reload. “There’s a producing buffer on that from approval; it’s important to wait. Plus, that’s an entire factor of like, what’s your manufacturing intent? Does it depend whenever you’ll purchase the potato? Is it having any potato in your home? Any potato merchandise?”

Whereas Clark’s registration effort is one thing of a troll, gun-rights lawyer Matt Larosiere famous it isn’t totally a laughing matter.
“The phrases ‘firearm silencer’ and ‘firearm muffler’ imply any system for silencing, muffling, or diminishing the report of a transportable firearm. So, the definition is fairly broad with respect to a silencer itself, versus the definitions overlaying silencer components,” Larosiere, who has handled many NFA registrations over time, instructed The Reload. “We will see this going method again to ATF’s precursors deeming the XM177 moderator a ‘silencer,’ although it barely lowered muzzle report. Alternatively, we’ve seen ATF constantly take the place in willpower letters and when giving professional testimony, {that a} pillow or potato, when used ‘for’ diminishing the report of a firearm, are in actual fact ‘silencers.’”
Larosiere mentioned it doesn’t actually matter how important the noise discount is, both. What issues is whether or not the “system” is for decreasing the noise or not. Which is related as a result of Clark isn’t the primary particular person to have the concept of strapping a potato to the top of a gun with the intention to suppress the sound of gunfire. At the very least a couple of YouTube accounts have examined whether or not spuds can successfully silence gunshots, with unimpressive outcomes, together with a take a look at by licensed producer SilencerCo. (It’s not clear whether or not these potatoes had been formally registered with the ATF or not.)
Moreover, there’s some historical past of individuals misusing potatoes as suppressors in the true world. There have been a number of circumstances the place individuals have tried to make use of improvised potato silencers in crimes, with one case wrapping up as not too long ago as final 12 months. One incident was reportedly impressed by a Hollywood depiction of a potato suppressor in season 4 of The Wire.
Some lawmakers have additionally warned that the ATF’s interpretation of what constitutes a silencer is overly broad and will embody potatoes. In 2022, Republican Congressman Daniel Webster warned, “anybody with a potato of their house might be committing a felony” in a newspaper piece.
Clark mentioned that historical past was on his thoughts when he determined to submit his potato silencer registration simply after the ball dropped on New Yr’s Day.
“This appears to be what the ATF has run with traditionally,” he mentioned. “Something you possibly can placed on the top of the system that would, even when it’s solely a single time, suppress the noise of a gunshot, they contemplate that an NFA merchandise. It’s similar to the way you get the goofy historic samples of a rubber band or a shoelace being thought of a machine gun, proper?”
He reasoned that if he might be arrested for having an unregistered potato silencer, then it have to be attainable to register one as properly.
“There was undoubtedly some precedent to it. And, you understand, and the argument is, when you can arrest me for possessing a potato suppressor, and I’m constitutionally allowed to have a potato suppressor if I’m going via the method, then I ought to constitutionally be allowed to register a potato.”


The ATF didn’t reply to a request for touch upon Clark’s registration, however the approval suggests they agree. Though, the message Clark’s approvals ship is a bit muddled. It seems he submitted three potato suppressors for ATF approval, however solely two had been authorised.
“Serial quantity Samwise01 was denied,” he mentioned. “However Tate001 and Tate002 had been authorised.”
He mentioned he bumped into the identical situation with the 3D-printed silencer designs he submitted.
“It occurred with a few of my 3D-printed suppressors, too,” Clark mentioned. “I had three that had been denied that used the very same documentation as the opposite 40 that had been authorised. So who is aware of? I’m assuming with what’s happening on the ATF proper now, they’re simply flying via them. So, there won’t even be a thought course of. The particular person may simply be clicking, sure, no, as a result of there’s chaos over there.”
He famous his potato silencer design is comparable in development to the 3D-printed design. However with a russet potato.
“It’s much like 3d printed ones, you get a metallic washer, and also you engrave the metallic washer,” he mentioned. “Then you definately use a bunch of epoxy and basically, like, soften it collectively to the place you possibly can’t take away the serialization with out damaging it. Similar as every little thing else.”
Clark mentioned it’s attainable the ATF mistakenly authorised his potatoes. He mentioned the eye his registration has attracted may get it revoked if the ATF turns into embarrassed by the state of affairs. However he mentioned he isn’t apprehensive, and the company revoking his registration may result in extra of the absurdity he’s attempting to focus on.
“I undoubtedly assume that’s going to occur, however I’m not like involved legally, as a result of, from what I’m accustomed to, what they’d do in the event that they did revoke it’s, it’s important to give it again,” he mentioned. “Okay, if you wish to ship an agent to my home to select up this potato, that’s even funnier. I’m all for it.”
He mentioned he might merely bake the potato for dinner if the ATF adjustments its thoughts and calls for he destroy it.
“What’s the authorized implication of consuming an NFA merchandise?” Clark requested.


He additionally famous some additional authorized questions that come up when registering an natural merchandise beneath the NFA.
“Should you plant the registered potato and it creates extra potatoes, are they beneath the identical serial quantity?” he requested. “Or is that manufacturing?”
For now, Clark mentioned he has no plans to submit any further meme designs. Nonetheless, he famous he isn’t the one one benefiting from the $0 tax to make a degree in regards to the breadth of NFA rules.
“There are different people who have talked about submitted kinds for pillows. One is especially humorous as a result of, for the documentation, it’s only a image of Mike Lindell holding a My Pillow,” Clark mentioned. “Individuals have submitted kinds for Monster Vitality cans. So, there are undoubtedly lots of people which can be going that angle.”
Ultimately, Clark framed his potato silencer as a type of activism that makes use of levity to highlight what he views as a major problem with the NFA.
“Making an attempt to have enjoyable whereas taking over the federal government is one of the best ways to do it,” he mentioned.


![Analysis: Will the Age of Potato Silencers Last? [Member Exclusive]](https://i3.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08030-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)

















