We’ve a circuit cut up growing on a nationwide “delicate place” gun restriction.
It’s over the publish workplace gun ban. This week, a federal choose in Connecticut grew to become the primary to uphold the ban, arguing that it matches inside the delicate locations custom. However he wasn’t the primary federal choose to contemplate the query in a post-Bruen swimsuit. I lay out for Reload Members the important thing factors of competition among the many three judges who’ve dominated on challenges to the ban, which the Supreme Courtroom might finally should resolve.
Maryland produced a number of important rulings this week, too. The primary delivered a win to the state in federal court docket over a problem to its “Pink Flag” legislation. The second delivered a state court docket win to gun-control activists urgent to carry Glock responsible for unlawful full-auto conversions of its pistols.
Contributing Author Jake Fogleman additionally explains why gun-rights activists are upset on the Division of Justice over pistol braces even after the company gave up on defending its Biden-era rule in court docket.
Plus, New York Occasions reporter Charles Homans joins the podcast to debate his piece on the well-known guntuber working for Congress. And we now have a number of extra tales down within the hyperlinks, together with an replace on how far 3D-printed weapons have come. Oh, and need me luck instructing new reporters in regards to the intricacies of gun journalism throughout my Nationwide Journalism Heart vary day at the moment!

Federal Choose Upholds Put up Workplace Gun Ban, Creating Circuit Break upBy Stephen Gutowski
The ban on carrying firearms into the publish workplace is constitutional, in response to a brand new ruling from a federal choose.
On Wednesday, US District Choose Vernon D. Oliver dominated in opposition to a Second Modification problem to the federal ban filed within the District of Connecticut. He discovered the trendy ban didn’t violate the gun rights of Individuals as a result of it was related sufficient to historic ‘delicate locations’ restrictions on gun carry, largely as a result of the truth that publish places of work are sometimes crowded public areas.
“The Courtroom holds that the challenged regulation right here, the Federal Facility Ban, as utilized to Put up Workplaces, is consistent with historical past and custom,” Choose Oliver wrote in Nastri v. Bondi.
Click on right here to learn the remaining.

Evaluation: The place Judges Diverge on the Put up Workplace Gun Ban [Member Exclusive]By Stephen Gutowski
A 3rd federal choose dominated on the constitutionality of the ban on possessing weapons on the publish workplace this week and created a burgeoning circuit cut up within the course of.
On Wednesday, US District Choose Vernon D. Oliver upheld the ban in opposition to a Second Modification problem. That follows a 2025 ruling from US District Choose Reed O’Connor and a 2024 ruling from US District Choose Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, which held that the ban does violate the Second Modification. Since these three judges are in three completely different federal circuits, that creates the prospect that this query might should finally be resolved by the Supreme Courtroom.
So, what are the important thing factors these three judges agreed and disagreed on?
If you happen to’re a Reload Member, click on right here to learn the remaining. If not, purchase a membership at the moment for unique entry!

Federal Choose Upholds Maryland ‘Pink Flag’ RegulationBy Jake Fogleman
Maryland can proceed to disarm gun homeowners deemed by a choose to pose a menace to themselves or others, a federal choose has dominated.
On Friday, US District Choose Brendan Hurson declined to dam Maryland’s “Pink Flag” legislation (RFL) in a case introduced by a person who briefly had his firearms confiscated after a dispute with native zoning officers. He decided that the legislation incorporates enough due course of protections. He additionally discovered that authorities officers tasked with finishing up confiscation orders are entitled to certified immunity regardless, and that the majority of the plaintiffs’ different claims within the case are invalid.
“Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction essentially overlaps with the Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims that Maryland’s RFL is unconstitutional,” Choose Hurson wrote in Willey v. Brown. “As a result of the Courtroom, in resolving the motions to dismiss, concludes that Counts One, Two, and Three of the second amended grievance are dismissed, the Courtroom will deny the pending movement for a preliminary injunction as moot.”
Click on right here to proceed studying.

Choose Provides Inexperienced Mild to Gun-Management Group’s Legal responsibility Go well with In opposition to GlockBy Shiv Parihar
A lawsuit in search of to carry Glock responsible for unlawful conversions of its pistols into computerized weapons is transferring ahead in Maryland state court docket.
On Monday, the Baltimore Metropolis Circuit Courtroom denied Glock’s movement to dismiss a lawsuit in search of restitution for the felony use of Glock merchandise. State Choose John Nugent dominated the swimsuit falls inside a brand new “public nuisance” exception to the federal Safety of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) created by Maryland’s new Gun Business Accountability Act (GIAA). He mentioned that was sufficient to permit the swimsuit to proceed previous Glock’s preliminary movement.
“Plaintiffs have sufficiently pleaded details that meet the predicate exception,” Choose Nugent wrote in Baltimore v. Glock. “Subsequently, underneath plain studying of the PLCAA and the GIAA, the allegations raised within the grievance should not preempted by the PLCAA.”
Click on right here to learn the remaining.

Podcast: Gun Politics within the Period of Guntuber Candidates (Ft. the New York Occasions’ Charles Homans)By Stephen Gutowski
This week, we’re speaking with a New York Occasions reporter about his newest story that examines guntuber Brandon Herrera’s run for Congress.
Charles Homans has been at The Occasions since 2014. Not like his co-author Thomas Gibbons-Neff, who was on our podcast final yr, Homans doesn’t give attention to gun tales. Nor does he cowl all 435 congressional races in every cycle.
You possibly can hearken to the present in your favourite podcasting app or by clicking right here. Video of the episode is out there on our YouTube channel.
Plus, Contributing Author Jake Fogleman and I discuss a brand new settlement that noticed New York comply with cease requiring gun carry allow candidates to reveal all of their social media accounts to the state. We additionally present an replace on Canada’s try to confiscate a whole lot of hundreds of just lately banned firearms, an effort that so far has seen lots of authorities spending with little to indicate for it.
Audio right here. Video right here.

Evaluation: Biden’s Pistol Brace Rule is Executed. The Authorized Danger for House owners is Not. [Member Exclusive]By Jake Fogleman
The Biden-era rule that sought to reclassify hundreds of thousands of pistols geared up with stabilizing braces as short-barreled rifles (SBRs) could also be gone, however the logic underlying it’s nonetheless very a lot alive inside the company tasked with imposing the nation’s gun legal guidelines.
In a Monday court docket submitting, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) urged a federal choose to dismiss a lingering lawsuit in opposition to its now-defunct rule introduced by the state of Texas and Gun House owners of America (GOA). The company claimed that the case is not justiciable as a result of a choose solely vacated the rule in a separate lawsuit; thus, the choose on this swimsuit ought to dismiss it as moot.
In the identical submitting, nonetheless, the company additionally made clear that it might “proceed to implement sure statutory necessities and prohibitions that they’ve been delegated the authority and accountability to manage,” particularly the Nationwide Firearms Act (NFA) and Gun Management Act (GCA) in opposition to sure braced pistols.
If you happen to’re a Reload Member, click on right here to learn the remaining. If not, purchase a membership for unique entry to this and a whole lot of different tales!
Exterior The Reload
ninth Circuit Upholds Federal Gun Ban for Misdemeanor Home Violence | Bloomberg Regulation | By Quinn Wilson
Federal Choose Upholds A number of ‘Gun-Free Zones’ in Texas | Bearing Arms | By Cam Edwards
Livid ex-NRA president accused of hurling water at lawyer throughout deposition | Uncooked Story | By Matthew Chapman
3D-Printed Weapons Are Getting Good | Motive | By Zach Weissmueller
Some Australian officers stroll again gun management dedication after Bondi Seashore taking pictures | Guardian | By Dan Jervis-Bardy
That’s it for this week in weapons.
If you wish to hear professional evaluation of those tales and extra, be sure you seize a Reload membership to get our unique evaluation publication each Sunday!
I’ll see you all subsequent week.
Thanks,Stephen GutowskiFounderThe Reload


![Analysis: Where Judges Diverge on the Post Office Gun Ban [Member Exclusive]](https://i1.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2026/01/white-product-label-stockpack-unsplash.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)



![Analysis: Biden’s Pistol Brace Rule is Done. The Legal Risk for Owners is Not. [Member Exclusive]](https://i1.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2023/01/DSC04508-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)
![Analysis: Where Judges Diverge on the Post Office Gun Ban [Member Exclusive]](https://i1.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2026/01/white-product-label-stockpack-unsplash.jpg?w=75&resize=75,75&ssl=1)












