Free Speech For People’s Statement on Decision in El Koussa v. Campbell

On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Judicial Court docket of Massachusetts issued a ruling in El Koussa v. Campbell, discovering that 5 petitions looking for to exclude app-based drivers in Massachusetts from state advantages and protections adjust to Article 48 of the Massachusetts Structure, which governs the poll initiative course of. The choice significantly jeopardizes the way forward for app-based employees and their entry to significant advantages and protections, and it reduces the Massachusetts poll election from a “folks’s course of” to a race as a substitute simply received by large company spending, together with from foreign-influenced companies. 

In September 2023, representatives of supply and transportation corporations sought to put on the November 2024 election poll 5 petitions that exempt app-based drivers from being designated “workers” underneath Massachusetts legislation, costing their employees the safety of labor and social security web legal guidelines. A gaggle of drivers challenged as unconstitutional the Legal professional Common’s certification of these petitions within the Supreme Judicial Court docket. And Free Speech For Folks, becoming a member of as amicus curiae, argued companies like Uber and Lyft, every which can be considerably owned by overseas entities and governments, have spent huge quantities on unconstitutional petitions that mislead and confuse voters with provisions that, in actuality, supply employees much less advantages than earlier than. 

The Supreme Judicial Court docket didn’t deny that the petitions exclude drivers from “necessary and far-reaching rights, privileges, and protections to which workers are entitled underneath present legislation” and “provides [them] restricted advantages in return.” However the acknowledgement didn’t forestall it from narrowly ruling that the petitions– some with the impact of impacting all legal guidelines in Massachusetts– cross the relatedness take a look at of the Massachusetts structure.  

This isn’t the primary time that foreign-influenced corporations like Uber and Lyft have used state poll processes to absolve themselves of authorized duties owed to employees. They’ve spent historic quantities in California to cross comparable poll measures. They’ve now damaged company spending information in Massachusetts to do the identical. 

Free Speech For Folks will proceed to make sure that the poll course of isn’t captured by company pursuits however as a substitute decided by the desire of the folks, in Massachusetts and elsewhere. 

To comply with the MA Not For Sale marketing campaign, click on right here. 

To learn the ruling, click on right here.