The Nickel-and-Diming of Gun Owners in California

Make no mistake: California’s politicians are rabidly anti-Second Modification. They’ll try any and each gun management coverage on law-abiding Individuals regardless of how absurd or unconstitutional. California’s Gov. Gavin Newsom set the phases for a nationwide political run in some unspecified time in the future by launching a dead-end effort to undertake a brand new Constitutional Modification to eliminate the pre-existing frequent legislation rights enshrined inside the Second one.

Now, regardless of the tidal wave of gun management legal guidelines coming yearly from the supermajorities in Sacramento, California Lawyer Basic Rob Bonta needs to nickel-and-dime the Californians who do comply with the legal guidelines much more to suppress even additional their capability to train their Second Modification rights.

Underneath a newly-announced coverage and as TTAG just lately coated, AG Bonta is rising the charge charged to law-abiding Californians who comply with all of the legal guidelines to buy ammunition, together with present process a background examine, from one greenback to 5 {dollars}. Certain, he says there’s an open public remark interval for his workplace to obtain suggestions, however everyone knows the writing’s on the wall.

The Background

Fortuitously, in January of this yr, U.S. District Courtroom Decide Robert Benitez of the U.S. District Courtroom for the Southern District of California struck down the gun management legislation in California that required law-abiding gun homeowners to undergo a background examine verification and pay a $1 charge each time they wished to buy ammunition.

“The ammunition background checks legal guidelines don’t have any historic pedigree and function in such a method that they violate the Second Modification proper of residents to maintain and bear arms,” Decide Benitez wrote in his choice in Rhode v. Bonta.

It was welcome information. For leisure goal shooters who wish to spend time training on the vary, or younger shooters taking part within the extremely widespread youth taking pictures leagues or simply common hunters who get pleasure from heading to the fields and woods to get out and luxuriate in America’s biggest out of doors pastime, that further price can add up rapidly.

Sadly, the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit adopted up shortly after and granted a keep on the everlasting injunction issued by Decide Benitez, that means all ammunition purchases in California have been once more required to be carried out with background checks administered by California’s Division of Justice (CalDOJ) and all ammunition have to be obtained solely by means of a government-licensed firearm and/or ammunition retailer.

AG Bonta celebrated the ruling, saying it meant California’s “life-saving ammunition legal guidelines will stay in impact as we proceed to defend them in court docket.” There isn’t any information that demonstrates charging law-abiding Californians a charge to run a background examine on the acquisition of ammunition has saved lives.

400% Price Hike

With the ammunition background examine and charge scheme remaining in place at the same time as Rhode v. Bonta works by means of the courts, AG Bonta hasn’t had his fill and isn’t letting his foot off the gun management gasoline pedal.

In an announcement posted on the CalDOJ’s web site on Aug. 23, AG Bonta proposed jacking up the ammunition examine charge price from one greenback to 5 {dollars} – a 400 p.c improve that each one law-abiding Californians will bear every time they wish to purchase ammunition.

“As approved by Penal Code part 30370, subdivision (e), the Division’s present laws established a $1.00 charge for a Customary Ammunition Eligibility Examine (SAEC) and $1.00 charge for a COE Verification examine. This charge has not been ample to cowl the Division’s working prices for the ammunition authorization program,” CalDOJ web site states. “The proposed regulation raises the charge for a SAEC and COE Verification examine from $1.00 to $5.00.”

AG Bonta is holding a 45-day public remark interval that ends on Oct. 8, 2024. That is clearly political theater. When you consider AG Bonta will truly take into accounts any feedback from law-abiding Californians who oppose this blatant nickel-and-diming of their Second Modification rights, effectively then I’ve a Golden Gate bridge to promote you. All of this whereas he does nothing to prosecute and get powerful on the criminals who truly perpetuate legal gun violence.

Not Stopping the Fence-Jumpers

All of the myriad of gun management legal guidelines in California are already on the books and people nonetheless being pursued by Gov. Newsom and AG Bonta haven’t – and gained’t – lower crime within the Golden State. They usually aren’t stopping law-abiding Californians from buying firearms, both. Based on present NSSF-adjusted Nationwide On the spot Criminals Background Examine System (NICS) information, greater than 650,000 Californians purchased a gun in 2024 alone. Business estimates reveal that would embrace as many as 190,000 first-time consumers who’ve had sufficient and determined to take accountability for his or her private security.

August of 2024, marked the 61st month in a row that greater than 1 million background checks have been processed for the acquisition of a firearm nationally and greater than 22 million Individuals have turn into first-time gun homeowners since 2020. That’s about the identical because the inhabitants of Florida.

Even with the nickel-and-dime gun management coming from the likes of AG Bonta, Individuals are exercising their God-given rights to maintain and bear arms for lawful functions, together with self-defense. In the event that they register to vote and get to the polls and #GUNVOTE on Nov. 5, gun homeowners will make a distinction within the election, even presumably in California.