Vice President Kamala Harris took an aggressive stance on faculty safety throughout her time as San Francisco District Legal professional.
In a 2010 speech to the Commonwealth Membership of California, Harris backed including extra safety measures to guard college students in metropolis faculties. She mentioned she would like to not take aggressive safety measures however felt they had been needed. She mentioned upping the variety of cops at school and establishing metallic detectors had been two concepts she’d assist.
“The truth, once more the tough actuality, is that if these kids, as many do, suppose that once they stroll onto the college playground, certainly one of their classmates has a gun, they’re not going to focus, and so they will be unable to be in an atmosphere the place they will be taught,” Harris mentioned in a speech uncovered by The Reload. “So, no matter we have to do to make that college secure, I say we have now to do. I’d like to finish violence and rid all communities of unlawful weapons, however, till we try this, then we have to have secure school rooms, and if which means having a metallic detector or having extra faculty useful resource officers, then, you realize, robust occasions are trigger for robust measures.”
The speech sheds new mild on how Harris has considered the problem of college safety through the years. It may impression how some undecided voters finally break, which can matter so much in such a intently contested race.
Harris has not all the time supported including extra faculty useful resource officers (SROs). The truth is, throughout her 2019 presidential marketing campaign, she referred to as for eliminating them altogether.
“What we have to do about demilitarizing our faculties and taking cops out of colleges,” Harris mentioned at Benedict School’s Presidential Justice Discussion board. “We have to cope with the truth and converse the reality in regards to the inequities round faculty self-discipline. The place specifically, Black and brown boys are being expelled and or suspended as younger as, I’ve seen, as younger as in elementary faculty.”
Nonetheless, throughout her time as Vice President, the Biden Administration has continued to fund grants for faculties seeking to deploy SROs. In 2023, it additionally allotted $73.6 million in funding for extra faculty safety measures. Whereas that funding can’t be used to rent SROs, it may be used to put in metallic detectors.
In the meantime, her opponent, Donald Trump, helps faculty useful resource officers. In 2018, Trump signed the STOP College Violence Act, which offered $75 million in funding for hiring extra faculty officers–though he has additionally exaggerated how a lot financing the regulation offered. Moreover, Trump has backed arming lecturers, who he mentioned had been higher suited to guard their college students than police.
“These lecturers love their college students, and these lecturers are gifted with weaponry and with weapons,” Trump mentioned throughout a speech on the Conservative Political Motion Convention within the wake of the Parkland capturing. “I’d relatively have someone that loves their college students and desires to guard their college students than someone standing outdoors who doesn’t know the scholars.”
Harris’s 2010 assist for begrudgingly hardening faculties dovetails with Republican Vice Presidential nominee JD Vance’s place and contrasts with Democratic nominee Tim Walz’s feedback throughout their September debate. Vance mentioned he didn’t need his youngsters to should attend a faculty with seen safety measures however felt it could be needed for his or her security.
“The concept we will magically wave a wand and take weapons out of the arms of dangerous guys simply doesn’t match with current expertise,” Vance mentioned. “So, we’ve gotta make our faculties safer. I believe we’ve gotta have some commonsense, bipartisan options for the way to try this.”
Walz disagreed. He pointed to Finland for instance of a rustic that doesn’t have faculty shootings “although they’ve a excessive gun possession fee.”
“Nobody is making an attempt to scaremonger and say we’re taking your weapons,” he mentioned. “However I ask all of you on the market, would you like your faculties hardened to seem like a fort? Is that what we have now to do once we know there’s international locations around the globe that their kids aren’t working towards these sorts of drills, they’re being youngsters.”
The Harris Marketing campaign didn’t reply to The Reload‘s questions on her 2010 feedback, how she’d sq. them with Walz’s feedback, or why her views modified over time.
Harris additionally spoke about different gun coverage areas throughout her speech to the Commonwealth Membership. She mentioned she’d taken a double-pronged strategy to regulation enforcement as district lawyer, with a strict coverage for implementing gun crimes and a extra lenient strategy to rehabilitating low-level, non-violent drug offenders. She claimed she doubled the variety of violent felons her workplace despatched to state jail but additionally created a brand new program targeted on offering job coaching for first-time drug sellers between the ages of 18 and 24.
“I created a gun coverage,” Harris mentioned. “Some mentioned, ‘Why?’ I mentioned, ‘Effectively, weapons kill, and so we’re going to take gun crime severely.’ And we improve the conviction charges for gun crimes from 43 % to over 90 %. The essential work that should occur in responding to crime after it happens. However then we additionally created a re-entry unit in our workplace which is without doubt one of the solely re-entry items of a DA’s workplace within the nation.”
She additionally mentioned she put a selected emphasis on pursuing gun trafficking crimes, particularly these the place adults gave weapons to minors.
“I take severely, specifically, these instances involving anybody, be they a minor or an grownup, who illegally possesses and makes use of a gun,” she mentioned. “So, that usually would require prosecution of these instances, nevertheless it additionally implies that we have now targeted an unimaginable quantity of consideration and precedence on the problem of adults furnishing weapons to minors and the step past that. And it’s one thing that our new police chief–who was incredible–George Gascone has talked so much about, which can be focusing assets on the people who find themselves trafficking weapons into our communities in a method that they’re ending up within the arms of people who find themselves committing violent crime.”
The 2010 feedback on SROs and metallic detectors aren’t the one time Harris spoke to the Commonwealth Membership of California about gun coverage. In audio unearthed earlier this week, Harris expressed doubt that the 2005 San Francisco handgun ban poll initiative she’d backed was constitutional.