Tuesday, February 24, 2026
Patriots Who Carry
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
Patriots Who Carry
No Result
View All Result
Home Freedom of speech

Age Verification FAQ — Free Speech Coalition

Age Verification FAQ — Free Speech Coalition
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter



final up to date: March 26, 2024

In 2022, Louisiana handed a legislation that mentioned:

Any industrial entity that knowingly and deliberately publishes or distributes materials dangerous to minors on the web from a web site that accommodates a considerable portion of such materials shall be held liable if the entity fails to carry out affordable age verification strategies to confirm the age of people trying to entry the fabric.

Since then, ten extra states have handed age verification legal guidelines, every with their very own particulars. We’ve put collectively this information to assist reply the most typical questions that FSC members have about age verification within the states.  

Who needs to be involved about age verification legal guidelines?

These legal guidelines apply to every “industrial entity” publishing content material that meets the state’s definition of “dangerous to minors.” This consists of virtually each on-line grownup platform and web site, in addition to the businesses or people which function them. 

If a minimum of 1/3 of the whole content material on a web site meets the state’s definition of “dangerous to minors,” the legislation applies. Every state has its personal definition for the time period, however they often comply with this format and customarily goal  nudity and sexually express content material. The legal guidelines don’t apply to some other medium (tv, in-person performances, and many others.).

Notice that the legal guidelines apply the place the web materials is seen, not the place it’s created, posted, or hosted. A content material creator may stay and work in Michigan and add to a platform operated by an organization in Delaware. But when a minor views the fabric in Utah, then Utah’s model of the legislation can present the idea for a lawsuit (in Utah state courtroom) towards that creator and/or platform.

How is it decided whether or not 1/3 of a website’s content material is dangerous to minors?

We don’t know. The legal guidelines merely say that if greater than 33-1/3% of the content material on the web site meets the definition of dangerous to minors, the legislation applies. Whether or not “content material” is outlined as bytes, pictures, internet pages, video recordsdata, or one thing else completely is prone to should be determined by a courtroom if/when a lawsuit is filed towards a non-compliant website.

How are websites required to confirm customers are over 18?

Every state specifies what age verification strategies are “affordable” below their legislation. The commonest strategies required are:

Digitized ID: a state-approved cellular driver’s license (often obtainable as an app)

Authorities-issued identification: bodily or digital copies of government-issued identification paperwork akin to a driver’s license or passport

Transactional Information: a third-party vendor that verifies a person’s age through their mortgage, academic, employment, or different information

Industrial database: “a commercially obtainable database that’s recurrently utilized by companies or governmental entities for the aim of age and identification verification”

Any “commercially affordable” methodology: presumably, any methodology that verifies the age of a person, although it’s far too imprecise a requirement for any enterprise to make sure they’re in compliance

What these strategies have in frequent is that each one of them requires an individual to share extraordinarily delicate private data like photographs of their driver’s license or passport, scans of their face, or their mortgage historical past with a web site or vendor that they’re unfamiliar with.



Source link

Tags: AgeCoalitionFAQFreeSpeechVerification
Previous Post

March 2024 – Action Center

Next Post

Bolt Action Rifle Upgrades – Snipers Hide

RelatedPosts

The 2026 Legislative Outlook — Free Speech Coalition
Freedom of speech

The 2026 Legislative Outlook — Free Speech Coalition

February 13, 2026
Newsletter, 12 February 2026 – Inforrm’s Blog
Freedom of speech

Newsletter, 12 February 2026 – Inforrm’s Blog

February 13, 2026
Kansas Age Verification Lawsuits Dismissed — Free Speech Coalition
Freedom of speech

Kansas Age Verification Lawsuits Dismissed — Free Speech Coalition

February 12, 2026
Public Interest Group Calls on Congress to Impeach and Remove Attorney General Pam Bondi for Gross Abuses of Power
Freedom of speech

Public Interest Group Calls on Congress to Impeach and Remove Attorney General Pam Bondi for Gross Abuses of Power

February 11, 2026
Free Speech For People Calls on UN to Investigate U.S. Immigration Enforcement Abuses
Freedom of speech

Free Speech For People Calls on UN to Investigate U.S. Immigration Enforcement Abuses

February 10, 2026
Public Interest Group Urges State’s Attorney Rinehart to Launch Criminal Investigations into Federal Agents for Unlawful Assaults, Detentions, and Political Retaliation Against Lake County Residents
Freedom of speech

Public Interest Group Urges State’s Attorney Rinehart to Launch Criminal Investigations into Federal Agents for Unlawful Assaults, Detentions, and Political Retaliation Against Lake County Residents

February 10, 2026
Next Post
Bolt Action Rifle Upgrades – Snipers Hide

Bolt Action Rifle Upgrades - Snipers Hide

Odin Works Prism Precision Bipod Review

Odin Works Prism Precision Bipod Review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Ruger Glenfield Model A .308 Review

Ruger Glenfield Model A .308 Review

November 13, 2025
S&W 940 9mm Revolver Review

S&W 940 9mm Revolver Review

November 3, 2025
S&W Bodyguard 2.0 Carry Comp Review: Pocket .380 Upgrade

S&W Bodyguard 2.0 Carry Comp Review: Pocket .380 Upgrade

August 22, 2025
The Remington Mosin-Nagant: An All-American Pre-Soviet Rifle

The Remington Mosin-Nagant: An All-American Pre-Soviet Rifle

December 29, 2024
9 States Banning Assault Weapons in 2026 — What Gun Owners Must Know!

9 States Banning Assault Weapons in 2026 — What Gun Owners Must Know!

December 3, 2025
Gear Review: Cosmic Tactical Saturn 4×32 Prism Optic

Gear Review: Cosmic Tactical Saturn 4×32 Prism Optic

December 22, 2024
That’s #Patriotism

That’s #Patriotism

February 24, 2026
Bill Would Use Loophole to Restore Machine Gun Transfers

Bill Would Use Loophole to Restore Machine Gun Transfers

February 24, 2026
New Mexico Assault Weapons Ban Stalls

New Mexico Assault Weapons Ban Stalls

February 24, 2026
SCOTUS Once Again Punts On Duncan v. Bonta

SCOTUS Once Again Punts On Duncan v. Bonta

February 23, 2026
GOA Backs West Virginia Bill to Allow State-Facilitated Machine Gun Transfers for Civilians

GOA Backs West Virginia Bill to Allow State-Facilitated Machine Gun Transfers for Civilians

February 24, 2026
KelTec Drops the KP50 and MP50

KelTec Drops the KP50 and MP50

February 23, 2026
Facebook Instagram RSS

Patriots Who Carry is your trusted source for news and insights tailored for patriots and gun owners. Stay informed on Second Amendment rights, firearms legislation, and current events impacting the patriot community.

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Blog
  • Freedom of speech
  • Gun Laws
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Patriots
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result

SITEMAP

Copyright © 2024 Patriots Who Carry.
Patriots Who Carry is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video

Copyright © 2024 Patriots Who Carry.
Patriots Who Carry is not responsible for the content of external sites.