ATF Intervenes in Forced Reset Trigger Patent Lawsuit for “Public Safety”

In a transfer that has shocked many within the firearms neighborhood, the USA authorities, by means of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), filed a uncommon “Assertion of Curiosity” on January 26, 2026, in a non-public patent infringement lawsuit within the Jap District of Tennessee. The case pits ABC IP, LLC and Uncommon Breed Triggers, Inc. towards Timothy Hoffman, a person inventor, and his small Tennessee-based firm, Hoffman Tactical LLC. Slightly than remaining impartial in what’s ostensibly a civil dispute over mental property, the Division of Justice selected to weigh in closely on the aspect of the plaintiffs, urging the court docket to contemplate the “public curiosity” as strongly favoring a preliminary injunction towards Hoffman.

On the coronary heart of the dispute are pressured reset triggers (FRTs). These units enable semi-automatic firearms to attain a quicker cyclic price by mechanically resetting the set off after every shot. Uncommon Breed Triggers holds a number of patents on its model of this know-how, and it alleges that Hoffman infringed these patents by designing and publicly sharing 3D-printable recordsdata for the same “tremendous security” set off design. Hoffman, like many innovators within the 3D-printing and home-gun-building neighborhood, brazenly launched his recordsdata, enabling hobbyists to experiment and manufacture their very own elements.

What makes this case extraordinary is the federal authorities’s intervention. The ATF’s submitting explicitly states that it has a “sturdy curiosity… in discouraging unregulated manufacture of pressured reset triggers.” It argues that enjoining Hoffman would advance public security and help the company’s broader efforts to restrict the proliferation of FRTs. Remarkably, the federal government cites a Could 2025 settlement settlement it reached with Uncommon Breed, after years of aggressive enforcement actions towards the corporate, as justification for now backing Uncommon Breed’s non-public patent enforcement campaign.

This settlement is value inspecting intently. After the Supreme Courtroom’s 2024 resolution in Garland v. Cargill struck down the ATF’s bump-stock rule, the company’s authorized place on different rapid-fire units like FRTs grew to become precarious. Going through a number of hostile court docket rulings, the ATF selected to settle its civil enforcement actions towards Uncommon Breed. In trade for dropping the lawsuits, Uncommon Breed agreed to not design FRTs for handguns and crucially to “take all cheap efforts to implement its patents and search injunctions” towards anybody else making or distributing FRTs. In essence, the federal government outsourced a part of its regulatory agenda to a non-public firm, turning a former enforcement goal into an ally.

Now, when a small inventor like Timothy Hoffman independently develops and shares a competing design, the federal authorities steps in, to not prosecute him criminally, however to lend its appreciable weight to a company plaintiff searching for to close him down. This transfer is a profoundly troubling growth for a number of causes.

First, it represents an uncommon and arguably improper use of presidency energy in a purely non-public patent dispute.

The ATF brazenly admits it isn’t taking a place on whether or not Hoffman truly infringed the patents or on the opposite elements required for an injunction. Its sole contribution is to argue that the “public curiosity” issue ought to be “weighed closely” in favor of Uncommon Breed as a result of stopping Hoffman supposedly advances public security. But the ATF gives no proof, no crime statistics, no incident reviews,  linking 3D-printed FRTs or Hoffman’s particular design to prison misuse. The company’s concern seems to be purely prophylactic: it merely doesn’t like the concept of unregulated rapid-fire know-how current outdoors its most well-liked channels.

Second, the intervention sends a chilling message to impartial inventors and the open-source firearms neighborhood.

Hoffman shouldn’t be alleged to be promoting full triggers commercially on a big scale; as a substitute, the grievance facilities on his resolution to launch printable recordsdata totally free. This motion by Hoffman is a typical apply amongst hobbyists who consider that firearm know-how ought to be accessible to law-abiding residents for self-fabrication. By siding with Uncommon Breed, the federal government is successfully endorsing using patent legislation as a instrument to suppress non-commercial sharing of technical data, an end result that feels extra akin to censorship than public security enforcement.

Third, the federal government’s place is inconsistent with latest judicial traits. Put up-Cargill, a number of federal courts have dominated that pressured reset triggers don’t meet the statutory definition of a machine gun as a result of they nonetheless require a separate set off pull for every shot (albeit a really speedy one facilitated by mechanical reset).

Whereas the circuits are cut up, the Northern and Southern Districts of Texas have each held that FRTs will not be machineguns. The ATF’s personal settlement with Uncommon Breed implicitly acknowledges the weak spot of its prior authorized stance. But, the company now seeks to attain not directly, by means of non-public litigation, what it couldn’t accomplish by means of direct regulation.

Timothy Hoffman seems to be exactly the sort of small-scale American innovator the patent system was meant to guard: a person experimenting in his workshop, enhancing on current concepts, and sharing data brazenly. As an alternative, he finds himself dealing with not solely a well-funded company plaintiff however the full ethical and rhetorical help of the federal authorities. The DOJ’s submitting reads much less like a impartial assertion of curiosity and extra like an amicus transient on behalf of Uncommon Breed, urging the court docket to make use of the “extraordinary treatment” of a preliminary injunction in furtherance of ATF coverage preferences.

The broader implications are regarding. If the federal government can intervene in non-public patent instances to tip the scales at any time when the subject material touches on its regulatory turf, then mental property litigation dangers turning into a proxy battlefield for coverage disputes that ought to be resolved by means of laws or correct rulemaking. Congress, not the ATF, defines what constitutes a machine gun. And courts, not government companies, decide whether or not a patent has been infringed.

Timothy Hoffman deserves a good likelihood to defend his design on the deserves with out the specter of federal legislation enforcement hovering within the background, lending support to his company adversary. The firearms neighborhood has lengthy valued innovation, self-reliance, and the free trade of technical data. By throwing its weight behind patent monopolists towards impartial creators, the federal government dangers stifling precisely the sort of grassroots ingenuity that has pushed American firearm growth for generations.

As this case strikes ahead, observers ought to watch intently whether or not the court docket accepts the ATF’s invitation to deal with “public curiosity” as synonymous with “company choice.” The stakes are increased than one inventor’s 3D recordsdata; they concern the stability between legit mental property rights and the liberty to tinker, enhance, and share in a discipline central to Second Modification rights.

Timothy Hoffman could also be a small participant dealing with highly effective opponents, however he represents one thing a lot bigger: the enduring American custom of the storage inventor standing towards overreaching company and governmental alike.

ATF Leak Reveals Concern for 3D Machinegun Conversion Gadgets

Leak Reveals ATF Continues to Disregard Courtroom Orders on FRTs

About John Crump

Mr. Crump is an NRA teacher and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed folks from all walks of life, and on the Structure. John lives in Northern Virginia together with his spouse and sons, observe him on X at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.