The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is ending its long-criticized Demand 2 Program, in keeping with a affirmation obtained by the Nationwide Taking pictures Sports activities Basis (NSSF).
The transfer marks a major shift in how the company handles firearm hint information—and a win for gun retailers who’ve lengthy argued this system unfairly painted them as complicit in crimes that they had nothing to do with.
What Was the Demand 2 Program?
Launched in 2000 beneath the Clinton administration, the Demand 2 Program required firearm sellers to report when 25 or extra weapons bought by their store have been traced again to crime scenes inside a three-year window—what the ATF known as “time-to-crime.”
However critics say the coverage allowed gun management advocates and sympathetic media shops to misuse this hint information in “name-and-shame” campaigns that broken lawful companies and risked public security.
“Firearm retailers who observe the regulation have been being focused just because criminals later misused weapons they bought legally,” mentioned NSSF Senior VP and Basic Counsel Lawrence Keane. “It is a welcome step ahead.”
Whereas ATF’s acknowledged purpose was to make use of the information to help investigations, previous leaks of Demand Letter 2 lists—comparable to these involving the Washington, D.C. Metro Police Division—fueled controversy. The division grew to become the only real FFL in D.C. for a time, dealing with authorized firearm transfers. But when firearms that they had legally processed ended up in crimes, they too have been flagged beneath this system.
“It wasn’t as a result of D.C. police did something mistaken,” Keane mentioned. “It’s as a result of the information doesn’t distinguish between felony intent and authorized gross sales.”
NSSF has been particularly essential of former ATF Director Steve Dettelbach, who, in violation of federal regulation, reportedly shared protected hint information with media and advocacy teams like Brady United. The Tiahrt Modification—which Congress continues to assist—strictly limits public entry to such delicate information to guard investigations and regulation enforcement.
ATF’s Personal Phrases Undermine the Program
Even the ATF’s personal historic reviews have emphasised that look in hint information doesn’t suggest wrongdoing. In its 1998 Crime Gun Hint Evaluation, the company wrote:
“The looks of [a licensed dealer] or a primary unlicensed purchaser of report in affiliation with against the law gun… under no circumstances means that both… has dedicated felony acts.”
Legislative Assist for Stronger Protections
The tip of Demand 2 isn’t only a coverage shift—it comes amid renewed legislative assist to maintain hint information personal.
NSSF has thrown its assist behind Rep. Clay Higgins’ invoice, H.R. 1698, the Legislation Enforcement Safety and Privateness Act. The measure would reinforce the Tiahrt Modification by holding violators accountable for misusing or leaking firearm hint information.
“This invoice places enamel within the regulation,” Keane mentioned, calling it important to making sure hint information stays within the fingers of investigators—not activists.
What’s Subsequent?
Whereas ATF has not but made a proper public announcement, NSSF expects one quickly. For now, the firearm business is welcoming the tip of a program many seen as extra political than sensible.
Backside Line:
The tip of the ATF’s Demand 2 Program is a serious win for firearm retailers, regulation enforcement integrity, and the rule of regulation. It sends a transparent message: defending public security shouldn’t come at the price of smearing law-abiding companies.
*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! ***




















