Estimated studying time: 2 minutes
Gun House owners of America is elevating the alarm a couple of coordinated authorized assault on main firearms retailers by the DOJ and New York Legal professional Normal Letitia James — utilizing the Supreme Courtroom Vanderstok ruling as cowl to retroactively punish lawful gun gross sales.
In a latest Minuteman Second, GOA’s Ben laid it out plain: Brownells, Major Arms, 80% Arms, and others are being dragged into courtroom by DOJ attorneys nonetheless loyal to Biden’s anti-gun agenda.
And so they’re teaming up with Letitia James, who was just lately referred to DOJ for prosecution herself — but she’s nonetheless spearheading a campaign towards the gun trade.
All of it stems from a lawsuit New York filed again in 2022, concentrating on retailers for transport 80% lowers and frames — completely authorized on the time.
These so-called “ghost weapons” weren’t thought of firearms below federal regulation from 2016 to 2022, a undeniable fact that ATF affirmed in writing greater than as soon as.
However now, the DOJ and New York are attempting to rewrite historical past, claiming that these companies broke the regulation earlier than the regulation was even modified.
The kicker? DOJ intervened after the unique grievance, piggybacking off New York’s lawsuit as if it had been there all alongside.
Then, this month, those self same Biden-era attorneys filed new briefs claiming that the Supreme Courtroom’s Vanderstok ruling offers all of them the retroactive authority they should hammer the trade.
By no means thoughts that Vanderstok is being extensively criticized as a constitutional misstep — they’re utilizing it anyway.
As Ben defined, it is a bare try to “ravage the firearms trade” by holding gun sellers chargeable for merchandise that have been totally authorized on the time.
It’s authorized warfare at its worst — and it’s occurring below a DOJ now headed by AG Pam Bondi, who’s promised to guard the Second Modification. But by some means, Biden’s holdovers are nonetheless combating the final administration’s battles.
GOA is asking for solutions. Why is the DOJ nonetheless listed as a plaintiff on this case? Why hasn’t it withdrawn from the lawsuit? And, why are rogue anti-gun attorneys nonetheless operating wild contained in the DOJ?
Backside line: that is lawfare — a political hit job disguised as authorized motion — and it’s proof that merely altering management isn’t sufficient. These instances should be reined in, and the folks accountable should be held accountable.
*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! ***
