Estimated studying time: 4 minutes
Colion Noir lately addressed Jon Stewart’s monologue, which focused the GOP’s narrative on metropolis crime and gun management.
Noir criticized Stewart for mixing humor with deceptive statements, aiming to enlighten his far-left viewers.
“Jon Stewart did one in every of his monologues the place he wraps jokes round half political truths and outright lies with no context to make people who find themselves far left really feel like they’re smarter than they are surely,” Noir acknowledged, setting the stage for an in depth rebuttal.
Stewart started his section by humorously mimicking Trump’s depiction of gun sounds, “Bing, bong, bing,” suggesting even Trump shouldn’t worry weapons given his comical portrayals.
Noir rapidly countered, with a video of him capturing at a metal goal.
“I imply, in the event you’re going to get technical right here, that’s just about the way it sounds when a bullet hits a metal goal, simply saying,” Noir mentioned.
Additional, Stewart sarcastically remarked on the hazards of merely stepping exterior in New York, crediting the right-wing for exaggerating gun crime in Democratic cities.
Noir responded sharply by mentioning the true supply of the difficulty.
“Jon, Republicans aren’t saying there’s an excessive amount of gun violence in liberal cities due to weapons; they’re saying it’s as a result of liberal-run cities are notoriously lax on crime.”
He highlighted that probably the most violent cities for gun crime are Democrat-led, whereas Republican-led cities in gun-friendly states don’t face the identical ranges of violence, suggesting a failure in Democratic insurance policies fairly than gun legal guidelines themselves.
Stewart continued, claiming that 93% of unlawful weapons utilized in crimes in New York Metropolis come from states with lax gun legal guidelines like Florida and Georgia.
Noir punched again, saying gun management legal guidelines fail to discourage criminals who merely discover different means to obtain weapons.
He criticized the ineffective nature of gun-free zones, which invite extra shootings than they stop because of the prohibition on lawful gun carriers.
“Effectively, dumbass, shootings don’t occur typically, however they typically occur in gun-free zones the place residents aren’t allowed to hold weapons, which is why you don’t get an entire bunch of residents stopping mass shootings,” Noir mentioned.
Addressing legislative points, Stewart lamented legal guidelines that defend gun sellers and producers from being held accountable for crimes dedicated with their weapons.
Noir clarified the aim of such legal guidelines, emphasizing that they stop unjust lawsuits in opposition to gun corporations for the misuse of their merchandise by criminals—much like not blaming automobile producers for drunk driving accidents.
On the subject of terrorism, Stewart criticized Republican opposition to banning gun gross sales to people on the FBI Terror Watch Checklist.
Noir defended this stance by underscoring the dearth of due course of and potential for mislabeling harmless folks, which may unjustly strip them of their Second Modification rights.
“These lists typically embody harmless folks, like youngsters and members of Congress, with no clear solution to get them off. This units a harmful precedent that might erode civil liberties additional, which is why Republicans opposed it,” he mentioned.
Stewart additionally touched on the controversial challenge of bump shares, which the ATF had reclassified following the Las Vegas capturing.
Noir corrected the misunderstanding that bump shares flip rifles into machine weapons, explaining that they merely permit a semi-automatic rifle to fireside extra quickly by harnessing the gun’s recoil.
“It doesn’t flip a gun right into a machine gun; it simply doesn’t,” mentioned Noir.
Lastly, Stewart accused the Dickey Modification of stifling analysis into gun violence. Noir countered that the modification merely prevents using federal funds to advocate for gun management, to not halt all analysis on gun violence.
He urged that the actual objective behind Stewart’s critique was to leverage governmental authority to push for stricter gun management, fairly than objectively research gun violence.
Noir concluded by addressing the declare that it’s not possible to trace “unlawful weapons” as a consequence of restrictions on making a nationwide gun registry. He argued that the underlying objective of such a registry would seemingly be gun confiscation, which is why proponents push for it below the guise of monitoring “unlawful firearms.”
Via his rebuttal, Noir aimed to dissect and counter Stewart’s arguments, calling for a extra nuanced and factual dialogue on gun management and concrete crime coverage.
*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! All Native Gross sales are FREE! ***
