Cory Booker: Another Anti-Gun Hypocrite Exposed

For somebody who’s constructed a profession pushing gun management, Sen. Cory Booker certain travels with armed backup.

The Residents Committee for the Proper to Maintain and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) is looking out the New Jersey Democrat after one in every of his staffers was arrested Monday for carrying a firearm into the U.S. Capitol with no license.

In line with experiences, 59-year-old Kevin A. Batts — a retired Newark police detective and now a “particular assistant” to Booker — was taken into custody by Capitol Police after informing officers he was carrying a pistol.

Batts reportedly accompanies Booker to occasions, elevating critical questions: if common residents don’t want to hold firearms for cover (in response to Booker), why does the senator?

“Cory Booker has by no means met a gun management legislation he didn’t like,” mentioned CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. “He has supported all types of gun-grabbing proposals, the stricter the higher. But, it’s now revealed that Mr. Batts, described as a ‘particular assistant’ to Booker, typically accompanies him to occasions. Being a retired police officer makes him simply one other non-public citizen, with no particular privileges.”

“The actual fact he apparently goes with Booker, presumably armed, to numerous occasions in New Jersey is ample proof the senator thinks it’s okay for him to have armed safety, whereas he has labored to maintain each common citizen disarmed, and weak to violent crime,” he added.

Gottlieb didn’t mince phrases, evaluating the incident to a 1986 arrest of Senator Ted Kennedy’s bodyguard for unlawfully carrying firearms in a Senate constructing. That bodyguard, like Batts, was additionally a former legislation enforcement officer.

The kicker? Batts is from New Jersey — one of many hardest states within the nation for law-abiding residents to get a carry allow. It’s a transparent instance of the political double commonplace. Elites get armed safety, whereas on a regular basis Individuals are left defenseless by the identical legal guidelines these politicians push.

“Booker seems to be minimize from the identical material. Presuming his security is extra essential than that of the one mother or the working dad going from one job to a different to pay their payments and maintain their households protected,” Gottlieb added.

CCRKBA’s message is straightforward: If it’s ok for Cory, it ought to be ok for each accountable American.

The Second Modification isn’t a perk of political workplace — it’s a proper of the folks.

What do you suppose — is that this simply one other case of “guidelines for thee, however not for me”?

Ought to politicians like Cory Booker be held to the identical requirements they push on the remainder of us? Or, is armed safety solely acceptable when it protects these in energy?

*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! ***

https://gunsamerica.com/listings/search