Thursday, December 25, 2025
Patriots Who Carry
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
Patriots Who Carry
No Result
View All Result
Home Gun Laws

Former NRA President Claims Gun-Control Group Offered $5 Million for Her to Quit

Former NRA President Claims Gun-Control Group Offered $5 Million for Her to Quit
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


The previous head of the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation and longtime powerhouse Florida lobbyist is accusing a number one gun-control group of attempting to purchase her off.

Marion Hammer, the primary feminine president of the NRA, mentioned in a lawsuit filed in federal courtroom this month that Brady United supplied her hundreds of thousands of {dollars}. She claimed taking the cash would require her to chop ties with the NRA and cease lobbying on behalf of gun pursuits.

“In 2018, Plaintiff was contacted by an legal professional representing the Brady gun management group,” Richard Coates, Hammer’s lawyer, wrote within the swimsuit. “The group supplied 5 million {dollars} ($5,000,000) to Plaintiff if she would retire and stop advancing the pursuits of the NRA and defending the Second Modification.”

The stunning declare could make clear the political environment through the turbulent post-Parkland push that resulted in substantial new gun restrictions in Florida. It could additionally go even additional in revealing how deep the rift between the NRA and one in all its former presidents and high state lobbyists has turn out to be.

That’s as a result of the declare about Brady is available in Hammer’s lawsuit towards the NRA.

The 85-year-old Hammer spent greater than half her life as a lobbyist for the gun-rights group. She was a fierce ally of longtime CEO Wayne LaPierre, however gained a robust repute of her personal. Whereas she served as NRA President within the mid-Nineteen Nineties, Hammer gained prominence primarily by her work in Florida–the place she helped usher in a sequence of gun regulation reforms that made proudly owning and carrying the weapons simpler.

Hammer was a key participant in creating the authorized construction that noticed Florida earn the “Gunshine State” moniker, as evidenced by both aspect of the talk’s response to her 2022 retirement. Republican Wilton Simpson, who was the Senate President on the time, described her as “standing within the breach towards left-wing extremists who wish to take our weapons.” Shannon Watts, Mothers Demand Motion founder, mentioned Hammer had “been a driving drive to weaken Florida’s gun legal guidelines for many years, working to move lethal insurance policies after which conspiring with the NRA to extrapolate worst practices to different states.”

The Gunshine period didn’t final without end, although. Within the wake of the 2018 Parkland college capturing, the place a gunman killed 17 folks, Hammer and the NRA’s affect inside the state’s Republican-controlled authorities wasn’t sturdy sufficient to cease a raft of recent gun restrictions from making it into regulation. The legislature handed, and then-Governor Rick Scott (R.) signed, new Excessive Danger Safety Orders and restrictions on gun shopping for by these below 21.

It was round that interval when Hammer claims Brady supplied her an enormous payday to give up her gun-rights advocacy. In her lawsuit, she mentioned she reported the provide to LaPierre, and he adopted up with a form of counteroffer.

“Mr. LaPierre knowledgeable Plaintiff that he, together with NRA Treasurer Woody Phillips and NRA Chief of Workers Josh Powell, had developed a proposal that may guarantee Plaintiff’s continued involvement within the NRA by a consulting association, whereas funding a retirement for her future,” the lawsuit reads. “Though the brand new proposal would pay lower than half the provide from the Brady group, the proposal would permit Plaintiff to proceed working with the NRA for years to come back.”

Hammer’s lawsuit framed the deal as a retirement contract, the place she would proceed to advise the NRA as an alternative of taking over “different alternatives.”

“Below this new proposal, Plaintiff’s Contract can be prolonged for a further ten (10) years and he or she might proceed consulting on essential Second Modification points nationally, placing her able to finally retire from the nationwide scene,” the swimsuit reads. “Most significantly, nonetheless, the NRA would proceed to regulate Plaintiff’s ‘different engagements’ and guarantee itself that Plaintiff would by no means be aligned with the opposition. Plaintiff moderately relied upon these representations and determined to forego her different alternatives, whereas remaining on the aspect of the NRA.”

Whereas the NRA would attain its membership peak that 12 months, the gun-rights group’s greatest scandal additionally started to come back to gentle. LaPierre, Phillips, and Powell–the three males Hammer mentioned created her deal–had been all discovered liable by a New York jury for the misappropriation of hundreds of thousands in NRA funds. LaPierre, particularly, was accused of utilizing NRA funds on lavish private bills, reminiscent of personal flights and fancy fits.

Hammer remained a LaPierre supporter by the years-long ordeal. She additionally continued to be one of many solely NRA board members to gather tons of of hundreds from the group throughout that interval. Nonetheless, after LaPierre resigned within the weeks earlier than the jury’s findings, Hammer opposed a succession plan favored by different LaPierre-backers. Andrew Arulanandam, who briefly served as interim CEO after LaPierre’s resignation, then terminated Hammer’s contract with out clarification.

“Though Plaintiff had absolutely and considerably carried out the phrases of her Contract, no clarification was given for the NRA’s actions,” the swimsuit reads. “For the reason that date of the phone name, the NRA has withheld lawfully due funds to Ms. Hammer, leaving her with solely social safety as revenue.”

Hammer claims the termination is an illegal breach of contract. She additional claims the NRA has continued to make use of her likeness to advertise its work and that the group misapplied a donation she made to the group’s 501(c)(3) fondation by as an alternative sending it to its 501(c)(4), which disadvantaged her of the tax advantages to donating to the previous. She is searching for the unpaid contract quantity, curiosity, authorized charges, and different damages from the US District Court docket for the Northern District of Florida.

Neither Brady nor the NRA responded to requests for remark concerning the allegations. Hammer referred inquiries to her lawyer, who didn’t reply to a request for proof of the provide.

Nonetheless, others have responded to Hammer’s claims. The Residents Committee for the Proper to Preserve and Bear Arms, a separate gun-rights group, mentioned the accusation warranted investigation from the Inside Income Service. The group argued the alleged provide might violate Brady’s non-profit mission.

“This isn’t the type of provide a tax exempt group ought to be making below any circumstances,” Alan Gottlieb, the group’s chairman, mentioned in a press release. “Initially, no person’s First Modification rights ought to ever be on the market, and secondly, the character of this allegation virtually seems as if the gun management group was providing Mrs. Hammer a bribe to stroll away from a difficulty to which she had devoted most of her grownup life.”

Whereas the windup of the New York corruption trial and its relationship with exterior regulation agency Brewer Attorneys presents the NRA with a possibility to slash authorized prices in addition to transfer on from its scandal, it nonetheless has to cope with a variety of lingering lawsuits. Along with Hammer’s claims, the group faces fits from a class-action of former donors and Oliver North, one other former NRA president.



Source link

Tags: claimsGroupGunControlMillionNRAOfferedPresidentQuit
Previous Post

ATF Raid That Killed Airport Exec Sparks Explosive Federal Lawsuit — Here’s the Full Story ~ VIDEO

Next Post

GLOCK BAN BILL: All Politics – Zero Safety

RelatedPosts

Gun in Child’s Bedroom Leads to NJ Drug & Weapons Charges
Gun Laws

Gun in Child’s Bedroom Leads to NJ Drug & Weapons Charges

December 24, 2025
DOJ Sues DC Over AR-15 Ban
Gun Laws

DOJ Sues DC Over AR-15 Ban

December 24, 2025
Analysis: Trump’s Marijuana Moves Unlikely to Immediately Impact Gun Owners [Member Exclusive]
Gun Laws

Analysis: Trump’s Marijuana Moves Unlikely to Immediately Impact Gun Owners [Member Exclusive]

December 25, 2025
Federal Panels Rule Illegal Immigrants Are Protected by the Second Amendment but Can’t Own Guns Anyway
Gun Laws

Federal Panels Rule Illegal Immigrants Are Protected by the Second Amendment but Can’t Own Guns Anyway

December 19, 2025
DOJ Sues US Virgin Islands Over Gun Permitting Complaints
Gun Laws

DOJ Sues US Virgin Islands Over Gun Permitting Complaints

December 20, 2025
Analysis: Reshaped Third Circuit Raises Stakes of Second Amendment Legal Fights [Member Exclusive]
Gun Laws

Analysis: Reshaped Third Circuit Raises Stakes of Second Amendment Legal Fights [Member Exclusive]

December 17, 2025
Next Post
GLOCK BAN BILL: All Politics – Zero Safety

GLOCK BAN BILL: All Politics - Zero Safety

Gravity Ballistics and KraftWind as insurance policies – Snipers Hide

Gravity Ballistics and KraftWind as insurance policies - Snipers Hide

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
9 States Banning Assault Weapons in 2026 — What Gun Owners Must Know!

9 States Banning Assault Weapons in 2026 — What Gun Owners Must Know!

December 3, 2025
10 Gun Laws Just Changed After Supreme Court Ruling — New Rules Start in December!

10 Gun Laws Just Changed After Supreme Court Ruling — New Rules Start in December!

November 27, 2025
Ruger Glenfield Model A .308 Review

Ruger Glenfield Model A .308 Review

November 13, 2025
The .38-55 Winchester: A Historical and Technical Examination of a Legendary Cartridge

The .38-55 Winchester: A Historical and Technical Examination of a Legendary Cartridge

April 9, 2025
S&W Bodyguard 2.0 Carry Comp Review: Pocket .380 Upgrade

S&W Bodyguard 2.0 Carry Comp Review: Pocket .380 Upgrade

August 22, 2025
10 Gun Laws Just Changed After November Court Ruling —Here’s What Every Owner Should Know Now!

10 Gun Laws Just Changed After November Court Ruling —Here’s What Every Owner Should Know Now!

November 11, 2025
Booze, Bullets & Bad Decisions: A Sober Reminder

Booze, Bullets & Bad Decisions: A Sober Reminder

December 25, 2025
Fortify Your Foundation: Foot Health In Winter

Fortify Your Foundation: Foot Health In Winter

December 25, 2025
Guns Not The Problem, Restrictions Not the Solution

Guns Not The Problem, Restrictions Not the Solution

December 25, 2025
Penn/Swalwell Movie Flap Raises Questions of Consistency, Integrity, and Loyalty

Penn/Swalwell Movie Flap Raises Questions of Consistency, Integrity, and Loyalty

December 25, 2025
Gun in Child’s Bedroom Leads to NJ Drug & Weapons Charges

Gun in Child’s Bedroom Leads to NJ Drug & Weapons Charges

December 24, 2025
Fiocchi Range Dynamics 9mm 115gr FMJ Ammunition 1000 Rounds – 0.21 Each! Free Shipping

Fiocchi Range Dynamics 9mm 115gr FMJ Ammunition 1000 Rounds – 0.21 Each! Free Shipping

December 24, 2025
Facebook Instagram RSS

Patriots Who Carry is your trusted source for news and insights tailored for patriots and gun owners. Stay informed on Second Amendment rights, firearms legislation, and current events impacting the patriot community.

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Blog
  • Freedom of speech
  • Gun Laws
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Patriots
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result

SITEMAP

Copyright © 2024 Patriots Who Carry.
Patriots Who Carry is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video

Copyright © 2024 Patriots Who Carry.
Patriots Who Carry is not responsible for the content of external sites.