Adam Kraut, Govt Director of the Second Modification Basis (SAF), lays out one thing that usually will get misplaced in headlines: actual progress on Second Modification rights doesn’t come from speeches—it comes from lawsuits, court docket orders, and relentless follow-through.
Right here’s the large image, in plain phrases, for anybody who cares about the precise to maintain and bear arms and needs to know what truly moved the needle in 2025.
Lawfare, Not Lip Service
In 2025 alone, SAF filed 13 new lawsuits. These weren’t symbolic circumstances. They focused real-world abuses that have an effect on on a regular basis gun homeowners:
Extreme and punitive carry allow charges
Legal guidelines that deal with 18–20-year-old adults as second-class residents
Blanket bans, together with New Jersey’s complete silencer prohibition
Authorities overreach tied to so-called “prohibited individuals”
One case ought to concern anybody who values due course of: SAF sued after a faculty district ordered an illegal car search of a pupil—solely as a result of the scholar legally exercised Second Modification rights off campus. That’s not “faculty security.” That’s punishment for exercising a constitutional proper.
One other case hit even nearer to dwelling. A New Jersey man had his firearms confiscated as a result of his spouse—who had no entry to his weapons—was involuntarily dedicated. No crime. No violation. Simply guilt by affiliation. SAF took the case, and after months of stonewalling, his weapons have been lastly returned.
That’s what enforcement of constitutional limits appears to be like like.
Main Wins That Truly Matter
Some victories deserve particular consideration as a result of they set precedent:
In Reese v. ATF, SAF’s problem to the federal handgun buy ban for 18–20-year-olds was vindicated.
Minnesota’s ban on carry for younger adults was struck down.
In Illinois, a court docket dominated the FOID card unconstitutional when utilized to maintaining a firearm at dwelling for self-defense.
After which there was California.
In 2025, SAF delivered three main losses to one of the aggressive anti-gun states within the nation:
California was compelled to concern non-resident carry permits
The state’s one-gun-per-month rationing legislation was struck down
A speech-chilling legislation banning firearm promoting “engaging to minors” was thrown out
That’s not incremental. That’s structural harm to gun-control structure.
Holding the Line on Federal Overreach
SAF additionally secured an injunction in opposition to the USPS carry ban, pushed again on so-called “delicate locations” schemes in New Jersey, and supported reopening federal firearms reduction determinations—one thing gun homeowners have been denied for many years.
Behind the scenes, SAF filed 16 amicus briefs, coordinated with teams just like the American Suppressor Affiliation and the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation, and labored to advance the primary significant optimistic reform to the Nationwide Firearms Act because it was enacted.
That issues. As a result of dangerous legislation doesn’t die by itself—it must be dismantled piece by piece.
Why This Ought to Matter to You
Proper now, SAF is concerned in over 55 energetic lawsuits nationwide. That’s not principle. That’s stress—on legislatures, companies, prosecutors, and courts.
Should you’re a well-informed gun proprietor, you already know the technique on the opposite facet: go the legislation now, let residents spend years and thousands and thousands preventing it later. SAF flips that script by assembly dangerous legal guidelines head-on and forcing governments to justify each inch of overreach.
That’s why the work highlighted on this video isn’t a recap—it’s a reminder.
Rights don’t implement themselves. Somebody has to indicate up in court docket.
Wanting Forward to 2026
SAF isn’t slowing down. New instructional efforts, investigative journalism, and extra litigation are already within the pipeline for subsequent 12 months.
If you wish to see extra dangerous legal guidelines struck down, extra confiscated firearms returned, and extra courts compelled to respect the Structure, the trail ahead is obvious: preserve supporting the organizations keen to do the exhausting, unglamorous work.
Watch the video. Share it. And perceive that 2025 proved one thing vital:
The Second Modification nonetheless has enamel—when it’s defended.
