Relating to most mainstream media journalists, you possibly can’t blame them for not understanding about firearms. They aren’t – for essentially the most half – “gun folks.”
On 60 Minutes, the CBS information program, Invoice Whitaker demonstrated the most recent irritating instance. He at the very least requested Vice President Kamala Harris what kind of firearm she owned. It was a brand new and shortly forgotten revelation when she first revealed she was a gun proprietor in 2019, however has resurfaced not too long ago after she repeated it through the ABC Information presidential debate after which advised Oprah Winfrey that she’d shoot an intruder if one have been to ever break into her residence.
The vp stated she owned a Glock and that, sure, she’d been to a taking pictures vary. Nonetheless, that was the extent of it – Whitaker moved alongside.
Her reply, although, opens up extra questions which might be frankly problematic for Vice President Harris and exhibit once more her hypocrisy of concentrating on law-abiding firearm possession whereas ignoring violent criminals.
The vp ought to reply a couple of extra questions. Consider, the vp is a California resident, a state with arguably the strictest gun management legal guidelines within the nation.
From all appearances, the vp has a severe case of “Gun management for thee. Not for me.”
Related Timeline
In 2019, the vp – then a U.S. Senator from California operating for president herself – advised media she owned a handgun and an aide later confirmed that “the handgun was bought years in the past.” The aide additionally acknowledged the vp stored the firearm locked up in her Los Angeles residence. There’s no pinpoint to that timeframe and the vp hasn’t supplied any extra particulars. It might imply she bought her firearm in 2015 or 2000. Stating the firearm was “bought,” nevertheless, does verify it was not given to her or handed down from household.
The vp’s skilled profession additionally issues to her skill to personal a Glock particularly. Harris started her authorized profession in California within the late Nineties and early 2000s. She began in Alameda County’s district legal professional’s workplace. Subsequent, she was recruited to the San Francisco District Legal professional’s Workplace and later to the Workplace of the Metropolis Legal professional of San Francisco. She was then elected District Legal professional for San Francisco in 2003, adopted by a leap as much as California Legal professional Normal in 2010 and profitable reelection in 2014.
What’s notable right here is that California’s strict handgun possession and buying legislation, the Unsafe Handguns Act (UHA), was enacted in 2001. Glock handguns have largely been prohibited for buy by the Common Joe in California. Glock Technology 1, 2, 4 and 5, along with U.S.-made Glock handguns are all at present prohibited on the market to most people by California’s restrictions. Solely Austrian-made Glock Technology 3 handgun fashions, which have been grandfathered, are at present authorized per the Unsafe Handgun Act (UHA).
It’s attainable Vice President Kamala Harris bought her Glock earlier than 2001. For those who consider that – I’ve a Golden Gate Bridge to promote you.
What’s most probably – whether it is actually true that the vp bought in some unspecified time in the future previously 10 or so years and owns a Glock – is that she used the UHA carveout exemption for legislation enforcement, which included sure staff within the district legal professional’s workplace or later when she was elected as legal professional common.
The legislation states:
“This part shall not apply to any of the next:… (4) The sale or buy of any pistol, revolver or different firearm able to being hid upon the individual, if the pistol, revolver, or different firearm is offered to … any district legal professional’s workplace … to be used within the discharge of their official duties. Nor shall something on this part prohibit the sale to, or buy by, sworn members of those companies.”
The information are easy. If the vp does certainly personal a GLOCK handgun in California for functions of self-defense, she possesses it underneath a gun management carveout that’s not accessible to hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Californians. By the way in which – the vp, as chief of The White Home Workplace of Gun Violence Prevention, is accused of colluding with gun management teams and the Metropolis of Chicago to sue GLOCK over allegations that they make unsafe firearms.
However Wait…There’s Extra
Not solely would Vice President Kamala Harris’s GLOCK possession be a blatant case of “gun management for thee, not for me,” she went even additional to attempt to prohibit personal handgun possession in California.
Not lengthy after the UHA was enacted in California, then-San Fransisco District Legal professional Harris forcefully supported Proposition H, a 2005 poll measure that banned San Francisco residents outright from shopping for, promoting and even possessing handguns. As soon as once more, as with the UHA, Prop. H included exception carveouts for active-duty legislation enforcement, navy and sure licensed safety guards. Prop. H was later struck down, however that didn’t cease Harris from supporting extra gun management extremes.
At a 2007 press convention, whereas nonetheless serving as San Fransisco District Legal professional, Harris advised authorized gun house owners that authorities might “stroll into their houses” to examine whether or not they have been storing their firearms correctly underneath a brand new proposal she helped draft.
“We’re going to require accountable behaviors amongst everyone in the neighborhood, and simply since you legally possess a gun within the sanctity of your locked residence doesn’t imply that we’re not going to stroll into that residence and verify to see when you’re being accountable and protected in the way in which you conduct your affairs,” she stated on the time.
Supreme Makes an attempt to Ban
It turns into much more hypocritical for the vp to say she owns a handgun not accessible to the California public, given her tenure as a legislation enforcement official. In 2008, then-DA Harris signed on to a District Attorneys’ friend-of-the-court temporary, or amicus temporary, in D.C. v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Courtroom’s main Second Modification case. Heller, after all, was a problem to Washington, D.C.’s, ban on handgun possession.
Which means the vp’s opinion was that not solely might California ban handgun gross sales and possession, however that the Second Modification doesn’t preclude whole bans on handgun possession. Actually, her temporary argues the precise to maintain and bear arms wasn’t a person proper in any respect, however that “the Second Modification gives solely a militia-related proper to bear arms.”
There are virtually too many ranges of hypocrisy to rely concerning the revelation Vice President Kamala Harris owns a Glock handgun saved in her personal residence again in California. There are virtually too many cases to recount concerning her present gun management positions that deny People self-defense whilst she enjoys around-the-clock armed safety.
The vp is trying to attain political factors in the previous few weeks earlier than Election Day and attempting her finest to influence gun house owners she’s one among them. The issue is, she’s the residing encapsulation of gun management’s basic hypocrisy: Gun management for thee, not for me.
