A Washington Decide rejected Sig Sauer’s plea to reverse the Washington Legal Justice Coaching Middle’s (CJTC) ban on the P320 pistol on Friday.
A decide in Thurston County denied the corporate’s movement to drive the legislation enforcement coaching facility to reinstate use of the weapon. She stated she was ruling solely primarily based on the temporary proof heard within the early stage of the case, and issues may nonetheless go the opposite manner throughout the deserves part of the trial, in response to KING 5.
“The court docket is denying the movement for a keep,” Superior Court docket Decide Carol Murphy stated in a ruling from the bench.
Nonetheless, Mike Faulk, the deputy communications director for the Washington State Lawyer Common’s Workplace, described the ruling as a big win for the state.
“On the listening to on Friday, the Court docket discovered that CJTC is prone to prevail on the problem of whether or not Sig Sauer has standing to carry this motion, that Sig Sauer was unable to indicate that it’ll undergo irreparable damage from CJTC’s administrative order, and that the court docket can’t dismiss the case given the risk to public security,” he instructed The Reload.
The choice could drive a few of Washington’s police departments to change to an alternate pistol for officers to hold, since they may proceed to be barred from working towards capturing the P320 on the state coaching heart. The choice additionally comes throughout a time of escalating issues over the P320’s security, after the Air Pressure International Strike Command paused use of the gun final month after a deadly incident on a base in Wyoming. It additionally comes as dozens of plaintiffs have sued Sig over uncommanded discharges, with two succeeding and receiving tens of millions in damages.
The CJTC offers firearms coaching and certification to police departments all through the state.
Earlier this yr, the Washington State Legal Justice Coaching Fee, which runs the coaching facility, instituted a rule barring officers’ use of the P320 on the coaching facility. That was prompted by an incident on the facility the place an officer’s P320 fired on the vary with no set off pull, injuring an officer, in response to the Fee.
Monica Alexander, govt director of the Fee, introduced the ban in March.
“My place needs to be security as a result of we all know a lot now that if I make a distinct choice, I don’t really feel like I’m being accountable,” she stated in an announcement.
Sig sued the Fee, alleging Alexander lacked the authority to institute the P320 ban with out going by way of the state’s rule-making course of. Sig additionally argued that the P320 is secure, the Fee’s ban is prejudicial, and its unfavorable feedback in regards to the gun are “defamatory”.
“The Motion is misguided, prejudicial, opposite to relevant statutes and rules, inconsistent with acceptable practices and rule-making procedures, lacks due course of, seems primarily based on inaccurate and incomplete details, just isn’t supported by substantial proof, and is bigoted and capricious,” Sig wrote of their grievance.
Some Washington police departments additionally pushed again towards the academy ban. Anacortes Police Chief Dave Floyd instructed KING 5 the transfer will price his division $35,000 as a result of they now have to switch their P320s with different handguns.
However the state stood agency and argued the CJTC isn’t alone in criticizing the P320’s design or barring its use.
“There may be an excessive amount of data on the market relating to this firearm due to the quite a few documented incidents of uncommanded discharges that this firearm has skilled,” Deputy Lawyer Common Justin Kato stated in court docket.

![Analysis: The Changes Gun-Control Groups Want in DOJ’s Rights Restoration Plan [Member Exclusive]](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08202-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)



![Analysis: How DOJ Justifies the NFA Despite its New $0 Tax [Member Exclusive]](https://i3.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08030-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)














