Estimated studying time: 2 minutes
Dr. John Lott is stirring the pot once more and this time it’s over who’s really committing mass assaults in America.
In a brand new op-ed, Lott takes goal at what he calls a “filtered narrative” round terrorism and mass shootings within the U.S., arguing that the info doesn’t match what Individuals are continuously informed.
In keeping with Lott, the dominant message from politicians and media has been clear: white supremacists are the first home risk. However he says a deeper take a look at long-term knowledge tells a extra difficult story.
What the Numbers Say
Lott breaks down mass public shootings from 1998 by 2025 and highlights a couple of key factors:
108 mass public shootings, involving 111 shooters
8 of these shooters had been Muslim (7.2%)
Muslims make up roughly 0.4% of the U.S. inhabitants
That’s the place his argument hits hardest. He claims that’s about 18 instances increased than their share of the inhabitants.
On the flip facet, Lott notes that:
White males commit mass shootings beneath their share of the inhabitants
Solely about 6.5% of attackers expressed white supremacist or comparable views
He additionally factors out that many shooters don’t match clear ideological containers in any respect, regardless of how they’re usually labeled after the very fact.
An enormous chunk of Lott’s argument isn’t simply in regards to the numbers. It’s about how these numbers are introduced.
He calls out what he sees as selective labeling, arguing that attackers with left-leaning or blended motivations usually get lumped into broader classes like “right-wing extremism,” whereas others are excluded from these counts solely.
That, in response to Lott, creates a skewed notion of threat and finally shapes coverage in methods that won’t match actuality.
The Greater Level
The Terror Risk We Aren’t Supposed To Talk about
The proof confirmed Muslims within the US commit terrorism at a tremendously disproportionate charge. The info additionally contradict claims that whites or right-wing white supremacists pose the first terrorist risk.https://t.co/jF7KwPPZNF
— John R Lott Jr. (@JohnRLottJr) March 17, 2026
To be clear, Lott does acknowledge that almost all Muslims should not a risk and that terrorism is available in many types. However his core argument is straightforward:
If policymakers need actual options, they should begin with correct knowledge, not political narratives.
And that’s the place this will get controversial. As a result of when you begin digging into who’s committing what (and why), it forces a dialog lots of people would fairly keep away from.
What Do You Suppose?
Is Lott exposing one thing actual right here or simply cherry-picking stats to make some extent?
Are we getting the total image on threats in America… or simply the model that matches the narrative?
*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! ***
