I hope you had a Merry Christmas! All our greatest to you and yours!
Simply because it was a vacation week doesn’t imply there wasn’t any information. In actual fact, the Division of Justice (DOJ) filed a first-of-its-kind go well with towards considered one of Washington, DC’s most controversial gun restrictions. It’s a continuation of the DOJ Civil Rights Division’s turning its give attention to gun rights particularly.
However, on the identical day, the DOJ additionally defended one other federal weapons restriction. It argued that not less than some pocket knives should not protected by the Second Modification. The dichotomy isn’t new, as Contributing Author Jake Fogleman explains, however it’s stark.
Jake additionally explains why President Donald Trump’s current transfer to loosen marijuana restrictions is unlikely to affect gun homeowners, not less than instantly. Plus, on the podcast, Seattle College legislation professor Alan Mygatt-Tauber explains the newest caselaw on unlawful immigrants and the Second Modification. And there are a bunch of different tales down within the hyperlinks, together with an summary of simply how a lot crime dropped this 12 months.

DOJ Sues DC Over AR-15 BanBy Stephen Gutowski
The Division of Justice (DOJ) thinks Washington, DC’s “assault weapons” ban is unconstitutional.
On Monday, the Second Modification Part of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division introduced a brand new lawsuit towards town. It claimed DC is violating the Second Modification rights of its residents by barring them from proudly owning fashionable semi-automatic rifles, such because the AR-15. It argued that, in accordance with a metropolis ordinance, the Metropolitan Police Division (MPD) has refused to register the affected weapons, thereby making them unimaginable to legally personal and infringing on residents’ gun rights.
“Unconstitutional legislation and official coverage obligates all DC Defendants to disclaim registration of Second Modification-protected firearms that law-abiding residents possess for lawful use inside D.C. and to arrest such people for conduct the Second Modification protects,” DOJ wrote in US v. DC. “Accordingly, DC Defendants have engaged, and proceed to have interaction, in a sample or observe of conduct by legislation enforcement officers that deprives folks of rights secured and guarded by the Structure, in violation of 34 U.S.C. § 12601(a).”
Click on right here to proceed studying.


Trump Administration Argues Second Modification Doesn’t Shield Pocket KnivesBy Jake Fogleman
The Second Modification protects the possession of AR-15s and the hid carrying of handguns, but it surely doesn’t defend proudly owning or carrying switchblade knives.
Not less than that’s the place the Division of Justice (DOJ) has taken in authorized filings throughout the nation in current days. On the identical day it filed a first-of-its-kind DOJ go well with difficult Washington DC’s “assault weapons“ ban, it individually filed an appellee’s transient in a case earlier than the Fifth Circuit Court docket of Appeals difficult the Federal Switchblade Act. Within the transient, the DOJ urged the court docket to uphold the federal ban as a result of “computerized switchblades“ are “well-suited to felony misuse“ and are “not protected by the Second Modification.“
“Congress’s restricted regulation of inherently hid knives is abundantly supported by two distinct, by interrelated, historic rules,” the DOJ wrote in Knife Rights v. Bondi. “The burden of historic authority demonstrates that these prohibitions and rules comport with the Second Modification, as a result of there isn’t a constitutional proper to hold hid or inherently concealable weapons.”
Click on right here to learn extra.


Evaluation: Trump DOJ Says Sure to AR-15s, No to Switchblades [Member Exclusive]By Jake Fogleman
The interior contradictions within the Trump Administration’s strategy to the Second Modification have been on full show because the 12 months winds down.
On Monday, the Division of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Rights Division filed its newest “sample or observe” lawsuit on behalf of gun homeowners. This time, it took purpose at Washington, DC’s “assault weapon” ban.
“Particularly, the District denies law-abiding residents the flexibility to register all kinds of generally used semi-automatic firearms, such because the Colt AR-15 collection rifles, which is among the many hottest of firearms in Amearrica, and quite a lot of different semi-automatic rifles and pistols which might be in widespread use,” the DOJ wrote in US v. DC. “Due to this fact, the District’s restrictions lack authorized foundation.”
For those who’re a Reload Member, click on right here to learn the remainder. If not, purchase a membership at present for unique entry!

Podcast: Analyzing the Struggle Over 2A Rights for Unlawful ImmigrantsBy Stephen Gutowski
This week, we noticed two federal appellate courts weigh in on the Second Modification rights of individuals within the nation unlawfully. The opinions lined quite a lot of positions on the query.
In fact, they aren’t the primary courts to handle the difficulty, and it’s solely develop into a extra widespread problem within the wake of 2022’s New York State Rifle and Pistol Affiliation v. Bruen. So, to dissect the state of the authorized debate, now we have Seattle College of Legislation professor Alan Mygatt-Tauber on the present. He has a legislation assessment article set to publish early subsequent 12 months that examines the state of the battle over undocumented immigrants and weapons, in addition to weighing in on the completely different arguments.
You possibly can hearken to the present in your favourite podcasting app or by clicking right here. Video of the episode is out there on our YouTube channel.
Plus, Contributing Author Jake Fogleman and I assess the political response to a pair of horrible mass shootings in Australia and Rhode Island. We additionally cowl two separate federal appeals court docket rulings that got here down this week, every upholding the federal gun ban for unlawful immigrants.
Audio right here. Video right here.


Evaluation: Trump’s Marijuana Strikes Unlikely to Instantly Impression Gun House owners [Member Exclusive]By Jake Fogleman
President Donald Trump simply moved to ease federal restrictions on marijuana. However for would-be gun homeowners who use the drug, the shift presents little in the way in which of a right away or definitive path ahead for authorized protections.
On Thursday, Trump signed an govt order recognizing the medicinal advantages of marijuana and inspiring additional medical analysis into these advantages. Amongst different issues, the order directs Lawyer Basic Pam Bondi (R.) to “take all obligatory steps” to finish a federal rulemaking course of that might downgrade marijuana from a Schedule I drug to a Schedule III drug below the federal Managed Substances Act (CSA).
Whereas doing so would take away marijuana from essentially the most restrictive class of regulated medicine, these decided to don’t have any accepted medical use and a excessive potential for abuse, a mere rescheduling order is unlikely to meaningfully change the authorized standing of marijuana customers who want to buy or possess firearms. Not less than, not within the close to time period.
For those who’re a Reload Member, click on right here to learn the remainder. If not, purchase a membership for unique entry to this and a whole bunch of different tales!
Exterior The Reload
2025 Yr in Evaluation: A Exceptional Drop In Crime | Jeff-alytics | By Jeff Asher
ACLU Joins Supreme Court docket Problem to Gun Ban for Marijuana Customers | Nationwide Legislation Journal | By Jimmy Hoover
Australia’s gun management consensus frays after Bondi Seashore assault | Reuters | By Kirsty Needham
N.Y. State Police Try and Get ‘Purple Flag’ Gun Ban Order In opposition to 11-Yr-Outdated Woman Was ‘Legally Frivolous,’ ‘Needlessly Threat[ed] Additional Harm’ | Volokh Conspiracy | By Eugene Volokh
Tenth Circuit Permits Injunction In opposition to New Mexico Ready Interval Legislation to Stand
Fifth Circuit Strikes Down Felon-in-Possession Ban Utilized to Delinquent Youngster Help Funds
Virginia Gun House owners Might Quickly Face Storage Mandate | Bearing Arms | By Cam Edwards
That’s it for this week in weapons.
If you wish to hear knowledgeable evaluation of those tales and extra, be sure to seize a Reload membership to get our unique evaluation publication each Sunday!
I’ll see you all subsequent week.
Thanks,Stephen GutowskiFounderThe Reload

![Analysis: What to Watch for on Guns in 2026 [Member Exclusive]](https://i1.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08197-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)
![Analysis: Court Tossing Long-Running Smith and Wesson Suit Marks End of an Era [Member Exclusive]](https://i0.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2022/01/DSC02798-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)



![Analysis: How Will SCOTUS React to Hawaii Citing a Black Code? [Member Exclusive]](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2024/01/20231230_130747-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)
![Analysis: Trump DOJ Says Yes to AR-15s, No to Switchblades [Member Exclusive]](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08215-scaled.jpg?w=75&resize=75,75&ssl=1)











