SAF AMICUS BRIEF SUPPORTS SCOTUS REVIEW OF HAWAII 2A REJECTION

BELLEVUE, WA – The Second Modification Basis has filed an amicus transient to the U.S. Supreme Court docket supporting Hawaii resident Christopher L. Wilson’s petition for a writ of certiorari in his problem of the Hawaii state Supreme Court docket’s decree that particular person residents within the Aloha State wouldn’t have the fitting to hold firearms for self-defense exterior of their houses.

SAF is represented in its effort by attorneys Edward A. Paltzik, Serge Krimnus and Meredith Lloyd at Bochner PLLC in New York, N.Y.

“When the Hawaii Supreme Court docket openly declared in February that the Second Modification basically doesn’t exist throughout the state,” famous SAF founder and Govt Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “we have been shocked. This declaration is so astonishing in its nature that the U.S. Supreme Court docket merely can not permit one-tenth of the Invoice of Rights to be arbitrarily erased. Hawaii continues to be a part of the USA. It isn’t a police state.”

“The Hawaii court docket has diminished a longtime proper protected by the federal Structure,” mentioned SAF Govt Director Adam Kraut. “That is nothing in need of open riot in opposition to the Supremacy Clause. Lawless judicial activism of such an excessive nature, if left undisturbed, would set a harmful precedent that State supreme courts are free to tunnel beneath the constitutional ground of the Second Modification. Tens of millions of peaceful, law-abiding adults can be disadvantaged of their elementary proper to hold firearms in public for self-defense based mostly on geographical luck of the draw. As a consequence of such chaos, the Second Modification can be rendered useless letter.”

In its petition, SAF makes clear the Second Modification isn’t a “second-class proper” topic to the political and philosophical whims of state Supreme Courts. The “Aloha Spirit” doesn’t trump the U.S. Structure. It is a non-negotiable matter of federalism.