SAF SUBMITS APPELLANTS’ BRIEF TO MD SUPREME COURT IN ‘RED FLAG’ CHALLENGE

BELLEVUE, WA – Attorneys representing the Second Modification Basis and Maryland resident Donald S. Willey have submitted an appellants’ transient to the Maryland Supreme Courtroom of their federal problem of that state’s so-called “pink flag” legislation. The case is named Willey v. Brown and it was filed in U.S. District Courtroom for the District of Maryland in August 2023.

Mr. Willey, a 64-year-old Marine Corps veteran, has been battling officers in Maryland’s Dorchester County over alleged di minimis nuisance and zoning infractions. In the end, Willey grew to become the topic of an Excessive Danger Protecting Order (“ERPO”) to have his firearms and ammunition confiscated, for allegedly making threats, which Willey steadfastly denied. Willey was compelled to endure a humiliating involuntary psychological well being analysis. The federal lawsuit alleges Willey’s constitutional rights have been violated for almost two weeks, after which his firearms have been returned.

SAF and Mr. Willey are represented by attorneys Mark W. Pennak at Maryland Shall Difficulty in Baltimore, and by Edward A. Paltzik, Serge Krimnus and Meredith Lloyd at Bochner PLLC in New York.

Whereas the federal case stays lively, it hinges on the interpretation of Maryland state legislation, so the federal district courtroom licensed two questions of legislation for the Maryland Supreme Courtroom to reply. As soon as the Maryland courts interpret/outline “cheap grounds” as used within the state’s ERPO legislation, the federal lawsuit will resume. These questions are:

What authorized commonplace does the time period “cheap grounds” connote within the Maryland RFL, codified in Title 5 of the Public Security Article of Maryland Annotated Code?
Does the statute allow an ERPO to subject upon a typical lower than possible trigger?

“This case is about how so-called ‘red-flag legal guidelines’ can  be weaponized towards non-public residents, and with the intention to flesh this out for our federal case, we’re asking the Maryland excessive courtroom to outline the that means of ‘cheap grounds’ within the state ERPO statute,” SAF founder and Government Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb defined.

“Solutions to our questions will assist make our case towards Maryland’s legislation,” famous SAF Government Director Adam Kraut. “Purple flag legal guidelines are primarily based on the inherently Orwellian perception you can take actions towards somebody for an alleged crime that hasn’t occurred. Such legal guidelines authorize seizure and punishment for a criminal offense no person dedicated however which may happen at some place and time sooner or later. The idea is absurd.”