Republican Governor Invoice Lee formally made it tougher to sue gun makers within the Volunteer State this week.
On Monday, he signed SB1360 into legislation after it handed the Home by a vote of 72 to twenty and the Senate 26 to six. That invoice explicitly forbids legal responsibility lawsuits in opposition to business members the place there isn’t a viable declare the corporate’s actions instantly precipitated the claimed harms. It additionally requires anybody who tries to implement an out-of-state judgment in opposition to a Tennessee firm primarily based on claims the state doesn’t permit to pay the corporate thrice the judgment, in addition to refund its authorized charges.
“To guard the person proper to maintain and bear arms, as assured by each the structure of this state and the USA Structure, by fostering a sturdy market to make sure prepared entry to arms and accompanying accoutrements, it’s the public coverage of this state to not permit restoration in opposition to a supplier, producer, or vendor of a professional product for certified civil legal responsibility actions or different causes of motion ensuing from or regarding the felony or illegal misuse of certified merchandise by third events, public nuisance or market share theories of legal responsibility, or every other principle of legal responsibility not acknowledged by the legal guidelines of this state,” the legislation reads.
The legislation is the newest growth within the nationwide battle over gun firm legal responsibility. That battle has continued for the reason that Nineties regardless of Congress passing the Lawful Safety of Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) in 2004, which limits what sort of legal responsibility fits will be introduced in opposition to gun makers. Gun-control activists have labored on methods to pierce the PLCAA’s veil of safety ever since, with some success in instances just like the Sandy Hook households’ settlement with Remington.
The Supreme Court docket is about to weigh in on the PLCAA’s protections this yr after listening to a swimsuit the Mexican authorities introduced in opposition to American gun makers in March. However the states haven’t waited for motion from the Excessive Court docket to both broaden or contract gun firm immunity. Blue states have labored to broaden avenues for activists to sue corporations underneath the PLCAA, whereas Crimson states have executed the alternative.
That motion has contributed to the exodus of gun corporations from northern states to southern states over the previous decade. Tennessee has collected a variety of main gun business gamers throughout that point. Smith & Wesson, Beretta USA, Barrett Firearms, Troy Industries, and several other others now name the state house. The Nationwide Taking pictures Sports activities Basis (NSSF) estimates the gun business now contributes round 13,500 jobs, with $3.7 billion in whole financial exercise, and $7.5 million in tax income to Tennessee.
The commerce group cheered SB1360 as a win for lawful producers.
“Governor Lee, and Tennessee’s lawmakers, are sending a transparent message that gun management lawfare focused in opposition to our business, which is significant to Tennessee’s economic system and the nation’s heritage of Second Modification freedoms, is not going to be tolerated,” Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President, stated in an announcement. “Governor Lee’s dedication to the lawful commerce in arms and free train of the rights to maintain and bear arms in Tennessee is demonstrated by the expansion of firearm producers shifting to the state to develop their companies.”
The Nationwide Rifle Affiliation stated the act “protects the firearm business from civil legal responsibility when their merchandise are criminally misused by third events, making Tennessee a extra engaging surroundings for firearm-related companies.”
In the meantime, gun-control advocates slammed the invoice, going as far as to say its supporters have “blood on their arms.” Everytown for Gun Security claimed the legislation makes it practically inconceivable to sue gun makers over the misuse of their merchandise as a result of plaintiffs must “current clear and convincing proof that the gun firm or supplier just isn’t immune,” which “successfully shields gun makers and sellers from being held liable—even when their negligence or misconduct causes actual hurt.”
“We’re sick and bored with listening to excuses from our lawmakers. Clearly, they’re keen to guard the gun foyer, however they’re not keen to guard our kids from gun violence,” Kristen Stirling, a volunteer with the Tennessee chapter of Everytown affiliate Mothers Demand Motion, stated in an announcement. “As a substitute of attempting to move life-saving gun security measures that would shield our state from mindless violence, lawmakers are as soon as once more devoting all of their power in direction of ensuring the gun business is rarely held accountable for the blood on their arms. They’re not simply failing us — they’re complicit.”
The legislation will go into impact on July 1st, 2025.

![Analysis: The Changes Gun-Control Groups Want in DOJ’s Rights Restoration Plan [Member Exclusive]](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08202-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)



![Analysis: How DOJ Justifies the NFA Despite its New $0 Tax [Member Exclusive]](https://i3.wp.com/cdn.thereload.com/app/uploads/2025/04/DSC08030-scaled.jpg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)














