Estimated studying time: 4 minutes
The capturing of Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse killed by federal brokers in Minneapolis on January 24, 2026, has grow to be radioactive nearly immediately. Everybody rushed to choose a staff. Professional-ICE versus anti-ICE. Professional-Trump versus anti-Trump. Gun folks versus non-gun folks. And in the midst of all that noise, the precise info and the Structure began getting trampled.
That’s why Colion Noir’s breakdown issues. He didn’t run cowl for anybody; he didn’t play partisan protection. He didn’t faux ugly info weren’t ugly. And, he did one thing that’s more and more uncommon: he stayed constant.
And consistency is the entire level of the 2A.
Let’s begin with the uncomfortable half. President Donald Trump. When requested about Pretti, Trump defaulted to a line that ought to make each gun proprietor cringe: “You already know, you possibly can’t have weapons. You possibly can’t stroll in with weapons. You simply can’t.” That’s not simply sloppy. That’s unsuitable. Flatly unsuitable.
In Iowa, Trump additionally advised a reporter, “I don’t like that he had a gun. I don’t like that he had two totally loaded magazines. That’s quite a lot of unhealthy stuff. And regardless of that, I’d say that’s… very unlucky.”
Pretti was legally carrying below Minnesota regulation. Carrying a firearm, even with “two totally loaded magazines,” shouldn’t be against the law. It isn’t proof of intent. It isn’t possible trigger. And it certain as hell isn’t justification for post-hoc political commentary that treats gun possession itself as “unhealthy stuff.”
Can the FBI simply implement the regulation with out adopting each leftist gun banner speaking level?
🚫Carrying a gun = unhealthy intentions.🚫Loaded weapons = unhealthy weapons.🚫Spare magazines = additional unhealthy.🚫Greater than 10 rounds = unhealthy.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 25, 2026
Right here’s the important thing level Noir nailed: when a pro-2A president says anti-gun nonsense, the 2A neighborhood doesn’t get a corridor go to disregard it. Calling it out isn’t betrayal. It’s accountability. Rights don’t survive on vibes or loyalty. They survive on consistency.
On the similar time, Noir refuses to mislead make anybody really feel higher. Was it sensible for Pretti to indicate up armed to a protest involving federal brokers? Most likely not. However legality and knowledge are two completely different conversations, and collapsing them is how rights quietly disappear.
Pretti didn’t lose his Second Modification rights as a result of he was protesting ICE. He didn’t lose them as a result of folks didn’t like his politics. And he didn’t lose them as a result of somebody determined, after the very fact, that carrying a gun “appeared unhealthy.”
That’s not how constitutional rights work.
Jon Stewart on level 🔥🎯
“I wasn’t shocked while you guys gave up the first Modification, and I wasn’t shocked while you gave up the 4th and the tenth and the 14th at Trump’s behest, however the 2nd?….Come on, guys. Weapons are your entire persona” pic.twitter.com/MhgGAfLet0
— Wu Tang is for the Youngsters (@WUTangKids) January 27, 2026
The place this case turns darkish is the video. Primarily based on the out there footage, Noir lays out what seems to be much less like a justified use of drive and extra like a cascading failure: poor situational consciousness, escalating drive, panic, and a state of affairs that spiraled into deadly chaos.
Probably the most damning element?
Pretti seems to have been disarmed earlier than pictures have been fired. An agent removes the firearm and strikes away with it. One other agent, who was apparently indirectly threatened, attracts and fires from behind. Then extra pictures observe, at the same time as Pretti is on the bottom, immobile.
That issues. Below Graham v. Connor and Tennessee v. Garner, lethal drive is judged officer-by-officer, second-by-second, below an goal reasonableness commonplace. A gun current shouldn’t be the identical factor as a gun being a menace. As soon as a firearm is managed, the authorized math modifications instantly, as Noir accurately asserts.
That is the place Homeland Safety Secretary Kristi Noem’s early framing runs into hassle. Calling this “defensive” earlier than the info are settled doesn’t assist public belief. And it doesn’t assist the brokers concerned if the proof doesn’t again it up.
None of this implies Pretti made good selections. Moving into an lively regulation enforcement confrontation whereas armed introduces actual threat. Noir is obvious about that. Carrying a gun means you assume the next sensible accountability, even when not the next ethical one.
However accountability cuts each methods.
Federal brokers carry weapons, authority, and the complete weight of the state. Which means their margin for error is smaller, not bigger. If the capturing continued after the menace was neutralized, that’s not politics. That’s regulation.
And that is crucial takeaway: this case shouldn’t be hijacked into an ICE debate or a tribal loyalty take a look at. Strip away the slogans and what’s left is a person who was legally exercising his rights, a sequence of unhealthy selections and reactions, and a lethal consequence that deserves scrutiny, not spin.
As Noir places it plainly: if this doesn’t trouble you, irrespective of which aspect you’re on, one thing is unsuitable.
The NRA unequivocally believes that each one law-abiding residents have a proper to maintain and bear arms anyplace they’ve a authorized proper to be.
— NRA (@NRA) January 28, 2026
The reality doesn’t care who you voted for. Rights don’t both. And if the Second Modification solely issues when it’s politically handy, then it doesn’t actually matter in any respect.
The investigation must play out. The info should be nailed down. However constitutional consistency isn’t non-obligatory. And Colion Noir is true to demand it, even when it makes folks uncomfortable.
Donald Trump has advocated for taking weapons away from Americans (2018 & 2025) with out due course of. And for these constitutionally challenged: the entire level of due course of is that it is given BEFORE the motion.
“Take their weapons first, due course of later.” -Donald Trump pic.twitter.com/VDzknVgMix
— The Final American Vagabond (@TLAVagabond) November 30, 2025
What’s your tackle this SNAFU? In Trump we nonetheless belief? Primarily based on the out there proof, was using lethal drive justified?
*** Purchase and Promote on GunsAmerica! ***
