Sunday, April 12, 2026
Patriots Who Carry
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
Patriots Who Carry
No Result
View All Result
Home 2nd Amendment

The Army’s Forgotten 6mm SAW Round

The Army’s Forgotten 6mm SAW Round
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


It’s attention-grabbing what number of army forces have experimented with varied 6mm cartridges. It appears to be a recurring theme that somebody makes an attempt to undertake some type of 6mm cartridge, however it finally falls quick for one cause or one other. The 6mm SAW was the Military’s first try to undertake a type of 6mm spherical within the Seventies. 

It’s value mentioning that the Navy and Marine Corps adopted a 6mm cartridge all the best way again in 1895. The 6mm Lee Navy was an enchanting detour in American rifle cartridge improvement, however finally the Marine Corps and Navy adopted the .30-06, and the 6mm Lee Navy light away. 

The Military SAWs program within the Seventies is fascinating, and I’ve written about it extensively. This system boiled all the way down to the U.S. Military looking for the correct mixture of rifle, caliber, and machine gun. They examined M14s, G3 clones from H&R, varied Colt carbines, together with the M15, a belt-fed M16, and extra. They blended squads of rifles and M60s, conducting quite a few experiments. 

Commercial — Proceed Studying Beneath

This led to experimenting with cartridges and calibers, ensuing within the 6mm SAW. 

Breaking It Down 

SAW did stand for Squad Automated Weapon, and as you realize, ultimately FN gained the contract and the M249 SAW. The sunshine machine gun portion was solely part of the experiment, and was the one half that caught round. The 6mm SAW cartridge was an try to enhance on perceived points with the 5.56 cartridge with out getting again into the world of full-powered rifle rounds. 

The 5.56 cartridge is a good rifle spherical, however is commonly thought of a substandard machine gun spherical. You need a machine gun cartridge that may present glorious long-range ballistics, particularly, so you may hold the enemy’s head down at lengthy ranges. A 5.56 machine gun has the identical functionality as a 5.56 rifle, which suggests your vary is similar. 

Commercial — Proceed Studying Beneath

A machine gun with higher long-range efficiency places its head down earlier and permits troops to shut on the enemy quicker. The 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge is a good machine gun spherical, however it requires a pretty big and heavy gun to handle, and the ammo tends to be heavy as effectively. The Military had a 7.62 machine gun; it wished one thing lighter. 

This led to the experimental cartridge, the 6mm SAW. The 6mm SAW provided the Military a 105-grain cartridge shifting at 2,520 toes per second. 

Commercial — Proceed Studying Beneath

Why 6mm? 

6mm or .243 caliber projectiles are a wonderful all-around measurement. They provide a excessive ballistic coefficient, with a great steadiness of recoil and velocity. It affords extra vary and a better diploma of penetration via cowl than 5.56, however gained’t require the load or machine gun measurement of a 7.62 cartridge. 

The 6mm SAW aimed to have an efficient vary of 1000 meters from a machine gun. That’s doubtless for an space goal, which is the place machine weapons excel within the first place. The 2500 FPS velocity may appear a bit of meek, however the 6mm spherical did a implausible job of retaining power. 

Commercial — Proceed Studying Beneath

The 6mm SAW cartridge used a 45mm case, very similar to the 5.56 spherical, clearly necked up for the marginally bigger spherical. What’s attention-grabbing is that the case was metal. Additionally they produced an aluminum case that was 50mm lengthy to steadiness the thicker case wall with the identical powder capability. 

The case base is 10.5mm, and the case neck is 9mm. It fashioned a novel spherical that’s but to be replicated. Even the 6x45mm wildcat doesn’t replicate the 6mm SAW. 

Commercial — Proceed Studying Beneath

Why metal and aluminum? The identical cause I used to purchase metal and aluminum case ammo when it was generally out there—it’s cheaper. The Military was additionally experimenting with making its ammunition cheaper. 

Finish of the 6mm SAW 

Finally, the 6mm SAW met its program calls for and promptly went nowhere. Why? As a result of the army already had 5.56 and seven.62, and didn’t need a third spherical. Which begs the query, why even create the cartridge within the first place?

I feel the 6mm SAW may have been profitable, however having three cartridges in a line platoon is logistically troublesome and was a lesson discovered throughout WWII. 

Commercial — Proceed Studying Beneath



Source link

Tags: 6mmArmysForgotten
Previous Post

Maine Voters Overwhelmingly Approve ‘Red Flag’ Law Ballot Measure

Next Post

Jason Salyer: Ask the Pros

RelatedPosts

Magpul Threw Up On My AK
2nd Amendment

Magpul Threw Up On My AK

April 12, 2026
Need a New Blade? Five Knife Makers to Check Out
2nd Amendment

Need a New Blade? Five Knife Makers to Check Out

April 11, 2026
Keep the Slithering Serpents at Bay
2nd Amendment

Keep the Slithering Serpents at Bay

April 10, 2026
Winter Gear Success: What Really Worked!
2nd Amendment

Winter Gear Success: What Really Worked!

April 9, 2026
A Valid Tactic? The Iraqi Reload
2nd Amendment

A Valid Tactic? The Iraqi Reload

April 9, 2026
The Civet 12 – Mag Fed Madness
2nd Amendment

The Civet 12 – Mag Fed Madness

April 8, 2026
Next Post
Jason Salyer: Ask the Pros

Jason Salyer: Ask the Pros

Fighting MAGA McCarthyism: Interviewing Tom Alter

Fighting MAGA McCarthyism: Interviewing Tom Alter

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Ruger Glenfield Model A .308 Review

Ruger Glenfield Model A .308 Review

November 13, 2025
The .38-55 Winchester: A Historical and Technical Examination of a Legendary Cartridge

The .38-55 Winchester: A Historical and Technical Examination of a Legendary Cartridge

April 9, 2025
S&W 940 9mm Revolver Review

S&W 940 9mm Revolver Review

November 3, 2025
S&W Bodyguard 2.0 Carry Comp Review: Pocket .380 Upgrade

S&W Bodyguard 2.0 Carry Comp Review: Pocket .380 Upgrade

August 22, 2025
NRA & GOA Voter Guides

NRA & GOA Voter Guides

August 21, 2025
Ruger American Gen II Scout .308 Review

Ruger American Gen II Scout .308 Review

February 11, 2026
Spanberger Signs Virginia Ghost Gun Ban With No Grandfather Clause

Spanberger Signs Virginia Ghost Gun Ban With No Grandfather Clause

April 12, 2026
DOJ Moves to Restore Gun Rights for Non-Violent Felons

DOJ Moves to Restore Gun Rights for Non-Violent Felons

April 12, 2026
Magpul Threw Up On My AK

Magpul Threw Up On My AK

April 12, 2026
The Tragic Radicalization Of Michael Gloss

The Tragic Radicalization Of Michael Gloss

April 12, 2026
Do Wounded Bears Attack More? Handgun Defense Data Tells a Different Story

Do Wounded Bears Attack More? Handgun Defense Data Tells a Different Story

April 12, 2026
Primary Arms SLx MicroPrismT Adds T1 Mount Compatibility

Primary Arms SLx MicroPrismT Adds T1 Mount Compatibility

April 11, 2026
Facebook Instagram RSS

Patriots Who Carry is your trusted source for news and insights tailored for patriots and gun owners. Stay informed on Second Amendment rights, firearms legislation, and current events impacting the patriot community.

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Blog
  • Freedom of speech
  • Gun Laws
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Patriots
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video
No Result
View All Result

SITEMAP

Copyright © 2024 Patriots Who Carry.
Patriots Who Carry is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Patriots
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Gun Laws
  • Freedom of speech
  • Shooting Sports
  • Video

Copyright © 2024 Patriots Who Carry.
Patriots Who Carry is not responsible for the content of external sites.