Opinion
The group of six Democratic lawmakers (all with navy or national-security backgrounds) — now broadly dubbed the “Seditious Six” — try to cloak themselves in constitutional righteousness.
In a extremely politicized video, they urged U.S. service members to “refuse unlawful orders,” a message so ambiguous and inflammatory that the Pentagon launched a proper misconduct investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly.
However none of this could shock anybody who has adopted their careers. For years, the Seditious Six have marched in lockstep with probably the most aggressive gun-control lobbies in America — pushing laws geared toward regulating, proscribing, or eliminating the firearms owned by thousands and thousands of peaceable, law-abiding residents.
Their “constitutional” posturing now is just not an remoted occasion. It’s the newest escalation in an extended, coordinated effort to weaken the Second Modification whereas hiding behind navy credentials and patriotic language.
Right here’s the breakdown.
The Shared Agenda: Each Main Gun-Management Proposal, Straight Down the Line
Every member of the Seditious Six has persistently superior the core priorities of Washington’s gun-control foyer:
Common Background Checks on All Gross sales: A federal “common” background-check mandate — together with non-public transfers — which gun homeowners appropriately view as an undeclared firearm registry.
Purple-Flag / ERPO Confiscation Orders: Seizure of firearms with no felony conviction, counting on the weakest customary of due course of obtainable in civil court docket. A mannequin ripe for abuse.
Bans on Semi-Automated Rifles & Customary Magazines: Each member helps bans or restrictions focusing on the commonest trendy rifles and magazines in America — the identical rifles utilized by thousands and thousands for lawful residence protection, searching, and competitors.
Federal Protected-Storage Mandates: Authorities-dictated guidelines on how Individuals retailer firearms inside their very own properties. Noncompliance means punishment; compliance means surrendering private autonomy to unelected regulators.
Individually, every proposal is unhealthy sufficient. Taken collectively, they quantity to a federal re-engineering of gun possession itself.
And now, with their “refuse unlawful orders” stunt, they seem keen so as to add sedition to their portfolio.
Meet the Seditious Six — and Their Information
Mark Kelly (D-AZ, Senator)
A naval veteran and retired astronaut who has develop into one of the vital constant anti-gun voices in Washington. Kelly co-authored and superior the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, increasing background checks, including new firearm prohibitors, and injecting federal {dollars} into ERPO methods nationwide.
He beforehand praised increasing background checks and now pushes the GOSAFE Act, redefining frequent semi-automatic firearms as prohibited “assault-type” weapons.
Elissa Slotkin (D-MI, Senator) Slotkin voted for the 2022 Assault Weapons Ban (H.R. 1808) and launched the Protected Weapons, Protected Youngsters Act, a nationwide safe-storage mandate that might criminalize many odd gun-owning households.
Jason Crow (D-CO, Rep.) A former Military Ranger who routinely makes use of the phrase “common sense gun reform” to advertise bans, ERPO orders, and restrictions on lawful gun homeowners.
Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA, Rep.) Former Air Pressure officer; constant co-sponsor of common background checks and journal restrictions; publicly aligned with nationwide gun-control advocacy teams.
Chris Deluzio (D-PA, Rep.) Former naval officer; a vocal proponent of assault-weapon bans and safe-storage mandates; often assaults political opponents as puppets of the firearm business.
Maggie Goodlander (D-NH, Rep.) Former intelligence officer; helps expanded background checks, red-flag legal guidelines, and elevated federal oversight of firearms.
These usually are not moderates. These usually are not compromisers.
These are six of probably the most dependable anti-gun votes in Congress — wrapped in navy uniforms and patriotic branding.
The Seditious Six, In Their Personal Phrases
Of their joint 2025 assertion defending the “refuse unlawful orders” video, the group declared:
“We’re veterans and nationwide safety professionals… we swore an oath to guard and defend the Structure. That oath lasts a lifetime.”— Joint Assertion, Slotkin, Kelly, Crow, Deluzio, Goodlander, Houlahan
They adopted that with:
“Our servicemembers ought to know now we have their backs… to observe solely lawful orders.”
However they supplied no examples of any “unlawful orders” they believed had been being issued — a element even CNN referred to as out.
When backlash intensified, Kelly tried to painting himself because the sufferer:
“I’ve given an excessive amount of to this nation to be silenced by bullies who care extra about their very own energy than defending the Structure.”— Mark Kelly, GoldRushCam interview
The rhetoric sounds noble — till you examine it to his legislative document.
Kelly’s Legislative Document: Emotional Appeals, Sweeping Bans
When reintroducing the GOSAFE Act on April 10, 2025, Kelly framed himself as a gun-owning fight veteran — an emotional enchantment meant to melt opposition:
“As a gun proprietor and a fight veteran… I do know firsthand the injury these weapons could cause.”
At a 2023 mass-shooting press convention, he pressed for even deeper restrictions:
“If that was not a high-capacity journal… you’ll have had fewer folks shot, and fewer folks killed.”
Kelly’s calls for usually are not about beauty options. They’re about capability, mechanics, and eliminating total classes of firearms generally owned by thousands and thousands of Individuals.
What This Reveals: A Coordinated, Lengthy-Time period Technique
The Seditious Six mix:
• navy authority• emotional narrative• aggressive laws• patriotic framing
That is no accident. It’s a deliberate communications technique designed to deflect expenses of extremism whereas advancing probably the most sweeping gun-control agenda in trendy congressional historical past.
They aren’t making an attempt to “stability rights with security.” They’re making an attempt to control the Second Modification out of existence — from the within out.
Why Gun House owners Should Pay Consideration
Slippery slopes are actual. “Common background checks” develop into registries.“Purple-flag legal guidelines” develop into pre-crime gun confiscation.“Protected storage” turns into selective enforcement.
Their navy backgrounds give them cowl.They use their service to make anti-gun positions sound patriotic — even heroic.
This isn’t incremental or remoted.This can be a bloc of lawmakers performing in unison, pushing the identical agenda, utilizing the identical language, backed by the identical nationwide teams.
Change the rhetoric, and you alter the nation. Change the definitions, and you alter the rights.
They know this. They usually’re good at it.
From “Refuse Unlawful Orders” to “Seditious Six”
The video wasn’t a “mistake.” It wasn’t “clumsy messaging.”
It was the subsequent step in an extended marketing campaign to redefine constitutional obligation in a means that justifies federal management over the weapons owned by the American folks.
Their message to service members raised pink flags. However their legislative document raises sirens.
If the Seditious Six succeed, gun possession in America won’t be a proper.
Will probably be a conditional privilege — one they reserve the authority to grant or take away.
This isn’t a debate. This isn’t a compromise.
Their voting information and this despicable video are an influence play to intestine your Second Modification and undermine a sitting U.S. President.
About Tred Regulation
Tred Regulation is your on a regular basis patriot with a deep love for this nation and a no-compromise method to the Second Modification. He doesn’t write articles for Ammoland each week, however when he does write, it’s normally about liberals Fing along with his proper to maintain and bear arms.
We’re in harmful instances! We’re SO CLOSE to our closing funding targets! Along with your assist we are able to make it!
Pentagon Launches Misconduct Probe Into Anti-Gun Sen. Mark Kelly After “Refuse Unlawful Orders” Video
